1. You are viewing our forum as a guest. For full access please Register. WindowsBBS.com is completely free, paid for by advertisers and donations.

W7 has taken a disliking to a program

Discussion in 'Windows 7' started by Moglex, 2009/11/30.

  1. 2009/12/01
    Arie

    Arie Administrator Administrator Staff

    Joined:
    2001/12/27
    Messages:
    15,174
    Likes Received:
    412
    An Experienced user such as yourself doesn't need that protection now do you?

    As to the discussion, I have only looked over it quickly, it looks like UAC (or Windows Defender?) has labeled the name of the EXE as 'suspicious'. I'd look into defender to see if you can bypass it.

    That's about all the ideas I have about it. Sorry, but I have no time to research this further myself, but wanted to give you some pointers.
     
  2. 2009/12/01
    Moglex

    Moglex Inactive Thread Starter

    Joined:
    2008/04/21
    Messages:
    67
    Likes Received:
    0
    You are, I hope, joking?

    I don't think that joke is in very good taste as it might give someone the idea that if you know what you're doing you can turn off UAC.

    Just in case anyone thinks you were being serious here is a quick scenario to demonstrate just why even the most experienced user (unless they never download anything) should not turn off UAC.

    EU is reading a forum and someone mentions a little utility that EU thinks would be extremely useful. EU does a google on the name of the utility and it doesn't come up with any warnings.

    EU (who has previously turned of UAC because, after all, he's an EU and knows what he's doing :rolleyes:) downloads the utility which has recently become infected with some malware.

    EU runs the utility and, because EU's turned off UAC, the malware silently makes changes to his system. Disaster ensues.

    It wasn't defender because I temporarily turned it off and the problem remained.

    And yes, I rather suspect that UAC has got it on its 'hit list'.

    Just hoping that someone will actually know what's going on. It's not a problem for me in this instance because there is an easy work around but this behaviour may become a problem to either myself or someone else at some stage so I thought it would be a good idea to see if anyone has a definite answer.

    But, please, people, stop suggesting that turning UAC off is an intelligent way to respond to a problem such as this. I'm sure most of us have seen at least one film where someone has gained access to somewhere they weren't wanted by causing an alarm to keep going off until someone disabled the security system thus allowing them access.
     

  3. to hide this advert.

  4. 2009/12/01
    Steve R Jones

    Steve R Jones SuperGeek Staff

    Joined:
    2001/12/30
    Messages:
    12,315
    Likes Received:
    252
    Moglex...unplug your network cable so that your computer does NOT have access to the internet....Turn OFF UAC and then test your little application to see what happens.
     
  5. 2009/12/01
    Moglex

    Moglex Inactive Thread Starter

    Joined:
    2008/04/21
    Messages:
    67
    Likes Received:
    0
    Same as before. (Remember that it behaves like that even when 'start.exe' is just a renamed text file with 'hello' in it.)
     
  6. 2009/12/01
    Arie

    Arie Administrator Administrator Staff

    Joined:
    2001/12/27
    Messages:
    15,174
    Likes Received:
    412
    You'll have to live with it... good luck!
     
  7. 2009/12/01
    Moglex

    Moglex Inactive Thread Starter

    Joined:
    2008/04/21
    Messages:
    67
    Likes Received:
    0
    As I've said, there is a simple and 100% effective workaround so it's no hassle whatsoever.

    There is still a possibility that someone who actually knows what's going on will see this thread and answer.

    W7 has not been out that long so I would not be at all surprised to see this crop up again.
     
  8. 2009/12/01
    kermit

    kermit Inactive

    Joined:
    2007/11/26
    Messages:
    13
    Likes Received:
    0
    i had a program that did the same,e as this, but i set it compatibility mode to windows server 2003 (service pack 1) and that seemed to have sorted the problem
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.