1. You are viewing our forum as a guest. For full access please Register. WindowsBBS.com is completely free, paid for by advertisers and donations.

Installing WinXP on SATA drives - specific drivers needed?

Discussion in 'PC Hardware' started by Christer, 2005/08/19.

  1. 2005/08/23
    savagcl Lifetime Subscription

    savagcl Geek Member

    Joined:
    2003/06/09
    Messages:
    1,559
    Likes Received:
    7
    From my hands-on experience, here is what i found (weather it holds true for
    all systems????),

    If you have 2 SATA's with 1 primary partition and 7 logicals,
    XP looks at them as basically 1 HD, (Disk0) setup as C Primary, D,E,F,G,H,I as
    logicals. I have only gone to 7 logicals. Larget partitions means less logicals.

    If you have 2 SATA's with 2 primary partitions and 3 logicals on each disk,
    Xp looks at them as 2 HD's (Disk0 and Disk1).

    I see no reason why you couldnt get the drive assignments to be in sequence
    using either scheme. Heres my HD layout - the only reason the "G" is there
    is its the protected partition from OEM, next fresh install and its gone.

    savagcl
     
    Last edited: 2008/09/17
  2. 2005/08/23
    Christer

    Christer Geek Member Staff Thread Starter

    Joined:
    2002/12/17
    Messages:
    6,566
    Likes Received:
    73
    clif,
    there are so many parameters to consider and I'm not surprized that on Your system, the SATA is not detected unless it has a primary partition.

    On a different system, PeteCs, the SATA is detected without a primary partition.

    Christer
     

  3. to hide this advert.

  4. 2005/08/23
    savagcl Lifetime Subscription

    savagcl Geek Member

    Joined:
    2003/06/09
    Messages:
    1,559
    Likes Received:
    7
    True!

    example 1 above msg only has 1 primary with 2HDs.

    clif
     
  5. 2005/08/29
    Christer

    Christer Geek Member Staff Thread Starter

    Joined:
    2002/12/17
    Messages:
    6,566
    Likes Received:
    73
    A quote from one of my previous posts in this thread:

    I used my old IBM 60GXP (PATA not SATA) to check the impact of different partition types and cluster sizes on the performance of Ghost. A side effect is that I have verified that WinXP doesn't change drive letters for existing partitions like the old Win9X systems did. The partitions on the IBM 60GXP became F: and G: regardless of them being logical partitions within an extended or primary partitions or one of each. I missed the opportunity to make the primary partition on the IBM 60GXP active but I don't think that would have changed anything.

    Christer
     
    Last edited: 2005/08/29
  6. 2005/08/29
    savagcl Lifetime Subscription

    savagcl Geek Member

    Joined:
    2003/06/09
    Messages:
    1,559
    Likes Received:
    7
    hrister,

    A clarification -

    Assuming 2 physical SATA HD's...

    1 Primary on Disk0.
    All logical partitions will belong (linked) to Disk0 (up to 7 logicals i think is max). Can be sequenced in drive letter assignments
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    2 Primaries, 1 on each HD (Disk0 and Disk1).
    All logical partitions will belong to the Primary located on same Disk (0 or 1)
    but can still be sequenced in drive letter assignments.
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Mixing a PATA and a SATA????????????????
    I have no idea what the scheme would be (sorry i cant help more).
    ----------------------------------------------------------------

    My drive letter assignments layout:
    DISK0:
    C (pri), D, E, F, G(FAT32, Hidden Recovery partition)
    DISK1:
    H (pri, FAT32), I, J, K, L

    Not much help for mixing drive types but,
    savagcl
     
  7. 2005/08/29
    Christer

    Christer Geek Member Staff Thread Starter

    Joined:
    2002/12/17
    Messages:
    6,566
    Likes Received:
    73
    clif,

    The way I understand it, a Primary is a Primary and Logicals "belong" within an Extended.

    Primary and Extended never meet, unless You are using Partition Magic which makes a mess of the nomenclature. There is no such thing as a "Primary Extended" and PM labeling unpartitioned space as Primary is also adding to the confusion.

    Christer
     
  8. 2005/08/29
    savagcl Lifetime Subscription

    savagcl Geek Member

    Joined:
    2003/06/09
    Messages:
    1,559
    Likes Received:
    7
    Christer,

    True about the extended containing logicals.

    I use Acronis Disk Director to setup the Primaries, Logicals, not PM.
    The 2 primaries i have are the ones that show in the MS Disk Manager. I'm
    assuming that if MS says Primary, thats what they mean (but, who knows) :)

    savagcl
     
  9. 2005/08/29
    Christer

    Christer Geek Member Staff Thread Starter

    Joined:
    2002/12/17
    Messages:
    6,566
    Likes Received:
    73
    clif,
    I believe that Microsoft use the correct nomenclature, well, in this case at least ...... :eek: ...... !

    Christer
     
  10. 2005/09/15
    Christer

    Christer Geek Member Staff Thread Starter

    Joined:
    2002/12/17
    Messages:
    6,566
    Likes Received:
    73
    By me in an earlier post:

    Yesterday, I installed a new system with two SATAs. The one on channel 1 has one primary and one extended with a logical. The one on channel 2 has an extended with two logicals.

    I got away with it ...... :cool: ...... or rather without it ...... :p ...... and my faith in SATA has been restored!

    Christer

    By the way, the "partition naming convention" discussion came up at RADIFIED in PARTITIONS: Partition Magic. Scroll down to replies by Dan Goodell for an excellent explanation.
     
  11. 2005/09/15
    TonyT

    TonyT SuperGeek Staff

    Joined:
    2002/01/18
    Messages:
    9,068
    Likes Received:
    396
    Interesting thread.
    I myself have installed xp on satas w/out any issues.
    I only ever use one primary partition, the os partition.
    Sunsequent drives always are just extended w/ logicals within it.
    I've been lucky in that the stock xp sata controllers have always worked w/ the sata drives I installed on, oem systems that I wiped and installed fresh.

    I did however have an issue once with Norton Ghost 2003 being unable to work properly using a Ghost boot floppy. I had to enter a switch -NOIDE in order for Ghost to save the image to a partition on a sata drive.

    On another note, what are the advantages of sata over ide?
     
  12. 2005/09/15
    Christer

    Christer Geek Member Staff Thread Starter

    Joined:
    2002/12/17
    Messages:
    6,566
    Likes Received:
    73
    As I understand it, the (current) performance advantages are small (insignificant?). If You are "performance oriented ", be careful when choosing model. I once had the opportunity to compare a Hitachi 7K250 PATA with a Seagate 7200.7 SATA. It was not even a contest. The Hitachi PATA easily outperformed the Seagate SATA. (This was while setting up a new system, transferring data from the old. Large number of files of varying sizes.)

    On the positive side:

    - The cables can be longer.
    - The cables are thinner and are a lesser obstruction to airflow.

    On the negative side:

    - The cables and connectors are less sturdy and have to be handled carefully.
    - SATA drives prompt a higher degree of creativity during installation. (People do have "all kinds" of problems.)

    On the neutral side:

    - SATA is the future, PATA will be phased out in due course.
    - The price premium for SATA is history. Maybe a few percent but not enough to be a deciding factor against SATA.

    I usually recommend:

    - Building a new system, SATA
    - Upgrading an older system that has PATA, stick with PATA.

    Christer
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.