1. You are viewing our forum as a guest. For full access please Register. WindowsBBS.com is completely free, paid for by advertisers and donations.

XP Pro on older Compaq Presario

Discussion in 'Windows XP' started by Margot, 2003/04/20.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. 2003/04/20
    Margot Contributing Member

    Margot Inactive Thread Starter

    Joined:
    2003/01/13
    Messages:
    49
    Likes Received:
    0
    I just finished networking an XP Pro Dell and a Win98 Compaq Presario (with a tremendous amount of help from Mike Flynn.)

    I installed Office XP on the XP Pro machine, and after checking requirements, installed it on the Compaq also. It seems to be much more efficient than the previous version of Office and that made me wonder if XP Pro would be more efficient on the older computer as well.

    It barely meets minimum requirements:

    Cyrix 6x86mx MMX ~256

    1.5 Gig of HD space left (although I could easily clean that up and I also have an external USB Maxtor)

    316.0 MB RAM (after video)

    Would it be a good idea to put XP Pro on the Compaq or leave things as they are?
     
  2. 2003/04/20
    Abraxas

    Abraxas Inactive

    Joined:
    2002/08/16
    Messages:
    2,361
    Likes Received:
    3
    My immediate impulse with Compaq's, especially laptops (you can't just pop out an incompatible modem, for example, and solve your problem for $10), is that you will end up in a world of hurt.

    Because of Compaq's often proprietary hardware and drivers, you may have difficulty finding drivers for the hardware that the laptop contains.

    Check the Compaq site. If that laptop was never sold with XP, then they won't have XP drivers.

    This test will do a basic scan of your computer online and advise you if your computer is ready for XP:

    http://www.pcpitstop.com/xpready/

    For a more thorough test, try Microsoft's XP-readiness test. It will examine your hardware as well as present software for XP-compatibility. It is a large, over 30 meg, download:

    http://download.microsoft.com/download/whistler/Utility/1.0/WXP/EN-US/UpgAdv.exe
     
    Last edited: 2003/04/20

  3. to hide this advert.

  4. 2003/04/20
    Margot Contributing Member

    Margot Inactive Thread Starter

    Joined:
    2003/01/13
    Messages:
    49
    Likes Received:
    0
    FYI, it's a desktop. However, I will try those suggestions--thanks.
     
  5. 2003/04/20
    Margot Contributing Member

    Margot Inactive Thread Starter

    Joined:
    2003/01/13
    Messages:
    49
    Likes Received:
    0
    The CPU is "sort of ready" so that's pretty much enough information for me. Sounds like it wouldn't be worth the possible trouble.

    Thanks.
     
  6. 2003/04/20
    mflynn

    mflynn Inactive

    Joined:
    2002/08/14
    Messages:
    4,141
    Likes Received:
    9
    I 100% agree with Abraxas!

    and

    I 100% agree with you Margot! Smile!

    You can help performace on it by a deep cleanup an a review and cleanup of startups!

    Mike
     
  7. 2003/04/20
    Abraxas

    Abraxas Inactive

    Joined:
    2002/08/16
    Messages:
    2,361
    Likes Received:
    3
    And I agree with Mike and Margot. What a mutual admiration society we have here!

    Margot--I didn't think it was going to work easily if at all, but I thought it better for you to convince yourself of that.

    XP is a rather CPU-intensive OS compared to 98 or ME. Office may have been faster, but I doubt XP would have been. It may have dragged and you would have regretted it.

    (I don't know where the laptop came from---maybe because I used to have a Dell? :confused: )
     
    Last edited: 2003/04/20
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.