1. You are viewing our forum as a guest. For full access please Register. WindowsBBS.com is completely free, paid for by advertisers and donations.

SeaMonkey Beta 2?

Discussion in 'Firefox, Thunderbird & SeaMonkey' started by Davezilla, 2009/07/27.

  1. 2009/07/27
    Davezilla

    Davezilla Well-Known Member Thread Starter

    Joined:
    2008/09/28
    Messages:
    454
    Likes Received:
    7
    Has anyone downloaded SeaMonkey Beta 2? I use SeaMonkey 1.1.17 at the moment & it is getting a little buggy in certain Yahoo pages & Gmail. This has been noticed by quite a few people. I am thinking about downloading SM Beta 2 & I have been told that I can have both the #2 Beta & 1.1.17 on the same computer. Has anyone done this?

    I am a bit hesitant as I downloaded Flock once & although it is based on the same engine (Gecko) it turned out to be a tad unstable. I finally got to see what BSOD looks like on Vista! :eek:

    I doubt whether SeaMonkey 2 will end up like that as #1 seems more or less fine (apart from a few small bugs). I have been using SM since 1.1.12 & I really like it. I am not sure if I should uninstall #1 first before downloading the Beta.
     
  2. 2009/07/28
    Ramona

    Ramona Geek Member Alumni

    Joined:
    2001/12/31
    Messages:
    7,481
    Likes Received:
    2
    Davezilla,

    Before installing SM 2.0B1, create a new Profile. If you don't, the Beta version will grab the existing Profile, which can cause corruption.

    To create a separate Profile for the Beta Version:

    Open SeaMonkey 1.1.17
    Click on: Tools | Switch Profiles
    This will give you access to the Profile Manager
    Click on: Manage Profiles
    Create a new Profile using a name other than "Default Profile "

    Now install the Beta Version, and when the Profile Mgr. prompts for the Profile, use the newly created one.

    You can also bypass the Profile Manager on each startup by follow these guidelines: How to Bypass the Profile Manager

    The instructions are for Netscape, but will work for SeaMonkey.
     

  3. to hide this advert.

  4. 2009/07/29
    Davezilla

    Davezilla Well-Known Member Thread Starter

    Joined:
    2008/09/28
    Messages:
    454
    Likes Received:
    7
    OK thanks Ramona. I may give it a try! ;)
     
  5. 2009/07/30
    Westside

    Westside Inactive Alumni

    Joined:
    2003/03/30
    Messages:
    4,506
    Likes Received:
    14
    I have not bothered installing 2.0, but I have looked at the nightlies, since day one.
    I think that few people work on it, explaining why there have been years since the first alpha came out. I am using a special location for 1.1.x, so I don't have to worry about using a special location for the profile, which is located in this path: C:\Documents and Settings\user_name\Application Data\Mozilla\SeaMonkey\Profiles
    I am not sure if that is the default location for 2.0 only, or for 1.1.x.
     
  6. 2009/07/31
    Davezilla

    Davezilla Well-Known Member Thread Starter

    Joined:
    2008/09/28
    Messages:
    454
    Likes Received:
    7
    OK thanks. It seems that I may be able to just uninstall 1.1.17 & install #2 beta. I will do a bit more research before I decide anything.
     
  7. 2009/08/01
    ackerberg

    ackerberg Inactive

    Joined:
    2002/02/02
    Messages:
    869
    Likes Received:
    2
    Hi Ramona,
    This is what is on your webpage:
    ---------------------
    The Target line should now be similar to this:
    "C:\Program Files\Netscape\Netscape\Netscp.exe" -p profilename


    NOTE: There is a space after Netscp.exe" and before -p
    -----------------------
    In the NOTE: don't you mean after -p
    You already said there is a space after ...exe which is before -p

    Hope you are enjoying the summer!
    Bob
     
  8. 2009/08/01
    Ramona

    Ramona Geek Member Alumni

    Joined:
    2001/12/31
    Messages:
    7,481
    Likes Received:
    2
    Hey Bob,

    No, it stands as it is, but you are correct in that there is a space after the -p.
     
  9. 2009/08/01
    ackerberg

    ackerberg Inactive

    Joined:
    2002/02/02
    Messages:
    869
    Likes Received:
    2
    OK.
    Bob
     
  10. 2009/08/01
    Davezilla

    Davezilla Well-Known Member Thread Starter

    Joined:
    2008/09/28
    Messages:
    454
    Likes Received:
    7
    Well, anyway...I have downloaded SeaMonkey 2.0 beta 1 & it is fine. In fact it is more stable than the stable SeaMonkey 1.1.17 release on my computer! It imported all of my bookmarks etc perfectly & I don't have any problems with loading in some Yahoo! pages as I did in SM 1.1.17. I have no plans to go back to 1.1.17.
     
  11. 2009/08/15
    catilley1092

    catilley1092 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    2009/08/13
    Messages:
    68
    Likes Received:
    8
    seamonkey is a fine browser,especially for a machine low on resources. I have it installed,but use it as a backup to its big brother,Firefox. It certainly beats out IE8.
     
  12. 2009/08/15
    Davezilla

    Davezilla Well-Known Member Thread Starter

    Joined:
    2008/09/28
    Messages:
    454
    Likes Received:
    7
    That's how I started out. I thought it would be a good back-up to Firefox if I had any problems with it. I had some problems with the Fx #2 to Fx#3 upgrade. Predominantly because of incompatibilities with the Google toolbar. Now Firefox is a back-up to SeaMonkey!
     
  13. 2009/08/15
    catilley1092

    catilley1092 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    2009/08/13
    Messages:
    68
    Likes Received:
    8
    I'm glad things worked out for you. Always seek and apply the best software to your machine. Sometimes what works for one may not for another.Good luck!
     
  14. 2009/08/15
    Davezilla

    Davezilla Well-Known Member Thread Starter

    Joined:
    2008/09/28
    Messages:
    454
    Likes Received:
    7
    Cheers, I am not always sure about betas but a lot of them are quite good & stable. I haven't tried the Opera 10 beta yet & I can wait for the final release. I have had virtually no problems with SeaMonkey 2.0 beta 1 (1 crash in Yahoo so far) & it is far more reliable than SM 1.1.17 which was becoming unusable on my computer.

    In fact it is more reliable than Safari's 4.0, 4.0.1 & 4.0.2 which would freeze & crash regularly until the 4.0.3 release! :eek:
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.