1. You are viewing our forum as a guest. For full access please Register. WindowsBBS.com is completely free, paid for by advertisers and donations.

Norton Internet Security 2003

Discussion in 'Security and Privacy' started by Snooker, 2003/08/19.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. 2003/08/19
    Snooker

    Snooker Inactive Thread Starter

    Joined:
    2003/07/16
    Messages:
    76
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hi ... I have a Norton Internet Security 2003 disk here and i am curious about something if someone could help me here i was just wondering if i could just install norton antivirus only and if so how so ???
     
  2. 2003/08/19
    charlesvar

    charlesvar Inactive Alumni

    Joined:
    2002/02/18
    Messages:
    7,024
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'm wondering the same thing.

    Someone has asked me to install NIS which I refuse to do. Haven't tried to install just the AV yet.

    Regards - Charles
     

  3. to hide this advert.

  4. 2003/08/19
    BillyBob Lifetime Subscription

    BillyBob Inactive

    Joined:
    2002/01/07
    Messages:
    6,048
    Likes Received:
    0
    When you put the CD and let it start there is a Custon Install ( If I remember correctly ) where you can choose what does or does not get installed.

    The same goes for Syste, Works. I only installed the utilities from it.

    BillyBob
     
    Last edited: 2003/08/19
  5. 2003/08/19
    Christer

    Christer Geek Member Staff

    Joined:
    2002/12/17
    Messages:
    6,585
    Likes Received:
    74
    I´ve checked my CDs on a computer which hasn´t any Norton stuff installed.

    NIS has the option to NOT install NAV, probably because NAV could be installed as a stand alone or as part of NSW.
    Setting up accounts for different users can be declined.

    NSW has a "selection page" like the one in Windows Office from which you can choose which components you want to install.
    NAV alone can be chosen.

    HTH,
    Christer
     
  6. 2003/08/20
    Johanna

    Johanna Inactive Alumni

    Joined:
    2003/03/08
    Messages:
    2,402
    Likes Received:
    2
    With Norton NIS 2003 you want to do the custom install anyway so that you don't install the "Parental Control Feature" that will install by default. Why would you not want the Internet Security, only the AV? I bought this product because I wanted the convenience of both products, or I would have purchased them separately. Just curious.
    btw, the IS is fully configurable. I specified exactly what was allowed to access the net, and what is not. (Why does M$ Office need to call home anyway??) I also like the way NIS can be set to report all activity.
    A word of advice: Install immediately after the OS, before any other programs, with the modem unplugged. After installation, turn on the modem and run Live Update until it comes back empty at least twice.
    Johanna
     
  7. 2003/08/21
    Christer

    Christer Geek Member Staff

    Joined:
    2002/12/17
    Messages:
    6,585
    Likes Received:
    74
    Well, I don´t agree with that. When a new version of Norton is going to be installed it is recommended to uninstall the previous version. Norton digs deep into the registry and is difficult to remove completely and because of that, Norton is the last application to go onto my harddrive.

    What I do, is spend a little more of my local currency and buy Norton Ghost. During the setup of my system, I create a few Images of the system partition along the way. The first with Windows and Office fully updated. The second with all applications that I know I´ll have for keeps added. The third with NSW, NIS and NG added.

    This way I can "roll back" my system and I always do so to #2 when I install a new application and then reinstall the Norton stuff. I´m rather static when it comes to applications and the most common new applications are the Norton stuff.

    How can I use NG without having it installed, you might ask?

    Before formating to do the fresh installation, install NG on the current system and make two Ghost Boot Disks. Images can be created and restored from these BDs and you really don´t need to have NG installed.

    What about being unprotected during all that work, updating the OS over the internet and so on, might be your second question?

    Well, I´ve done this a few times and I have always been lucky (touch wood) and the virus scan at the end of it all has come out clean. I NEVER configure the E-mail account or open Outlook Express before having an up-to-date anti virus protection. At the time of a known virus attack, like this week, I would probably occupy my time with something else ...... ;)

    Regards,
    Christer
     
  8. 2003/08/21
    BillyBob Lifetime Subscription

    BillyBob Inactive

    Joined:
    2002/01/07
    Messages:
    6,048
    Likes Received:
    0
    How and when you install Norton products depends on what was installed already.

    If norton was installed YES, uninstall the old first. But if Norton behaves properly it will not let you put in the new untill the old is gone anyway. In fact I have found that letting the new install remove the old is the better way to go.

    If you have just freshly installed the OS, YES make Norton the first item of business. And YES let it go online with the liveupdate ASAP before doing anything else. And YES run it until it does comeback clean.

    The idea of getting NIS into a new OS first is so the when you install other stuff that wants to call home you can say NO if you wish. This helps to keep a lot of unwanted trash off of the machiine.

    I no longer use Norton but I would still make the install Anti-Virus and Firewall software as the first item of business if I were to do a clean install of the OS. Especially with me bring on cable Internet.

    BillyBob
     
    Last edited: 2003/08/21
  9. 2003/08/21
    Christer

    Christer Geek Member Staff

    Joined:
    2002/12/17
    Messages:
    6,585
    Likes Received:
    74
    AFAIK, it doesn´t matter in which order things are installed, NIS first or last, the firewall can handle the different applications.


    I´m on broadband too and can get **** at 10Mbps ...... :eek: ...... but I stay disconnected as long as possible.


    If possible, I configure the different applications to NOT connect to the internet by themselves. If not possible, I let the firewall handle them.
    During the installation process I only connect to get updates that weren´t downloaded and burnt to CD beforehand.


    Two minds - two ways ...... ;) ...... More minds - more ways!!


    Christer
     
    Last edited: 2003/08/21
  10. 2003/08/21
    BillyBob Lifetime Subscription

    BillyBob Inactive

    Joined:
    2002/01/07
    Messages:
    6,048
    Likes Received:
    0
    I must be missing something somewhere again.

    I fail to see how a Firewall ( NIS ) that is not installed can handle anything.

    Unless you are thinking of the useless XP oneway ( incoming only ) XP Firewall. And I am not so sure that that blocks everything. Don't know there as I never used it. And do not need it. My Router is a EXCELLENT replacement for it.

    Plus if NIS is not installed there is no AV software either. Unless you have something else loaded.

     
  11. 2003/08/21
    Johanna

    Johanna Inactive Alumni

    Joined:
    2003/03/08
    Messages:
    2,402
    Likes Received:
    2
    If NIS is not enabled, I don't have the modem plugged in, therefore I am OFFLINE. XP's firewall is useless (lets any info out!) I like to install NIS first so that I can see what wants to call home, and decide whether to let it. You can also do this manually: NIS will scan all internet capable applications, and then you can set the behavior from there. One of the great things about Norton, in addition to the Symantec support, is that you can "set it and forget it" I like the tattletale globe, too, that lets me see all internet activity. Norton can actually "boss" M$, too, and that's always a cheap thrill. Still trying to figure out why some software (like Word!) thinks it needs to call home regularly. Not paranoid, just curious. LOL
    Johanna
     
  12. 2003/08/22
    Christer

    Christer Geek Member Staff

    Joined:
    2002/12/17
    Messages:
    6,585
    Likes Received:
    74
    BillyBob,
    are we talking past eachother again ...... :) ......

    I understood Your comment as the firewall had an easier task to control applications installed after the firewall and that isn´t the case. It doesn´t matter.
    I just want to install the Norton stuff last for reasons that You´re more than aware of - the uninstall business.

    You´re absolutely correct that a not installed firewall or not installed anti virus software doesn´t do anything good and the inherent XP firewall isn´t much better.

    The issue about configuring applications, an example: Adobe Acrobat has the choise to have it search for updates in a specified interval or never. I chose never because I don´t want to be interrupted by those things.
    When I manually ask it to find updates, I let it through the firewall on that occasion only. I don´t create a general rule to let it connect.

    NB: The activities, unprotected by a firewall and anti virus software, is only temporary and I am disconnected physically (plug pulled) most of the time when I install the system.



    Johanna,
    You´re a fresh breeze of confidence in Norton! I like that since it has been bashed here on the Windows BBS quite heavily in recent months.

    You´re right to stay disconnected from the net if NIS isn´t activated. Under normal conditions I´m connected via broadband as soon as I start the computer and I always have NIS running.

    However, during the installation of software it is recommended to disable the firewall and anti virus software. Since a fresh install means installing a lot of software, I see no reason to install them just to disable them.
    Most viruses (or is it virii) get in through E-mails and as long as Outlook Express or whatever isn´t started, you should be fairly safe regarding the time of exposure.

    Christer
     
  13. 2003/08/22
    BillyBob Lifetime Subscription

    BillyBob Inactive

    Joined:
    2002/01/07
    Messages:
    6,048
    Likes Received:
    0
    Good Morning Christer

    I do not use NIS but Kerio which is just as good with less ( far less ) system loading.

    And Kerio and AVG are not as OS specific as NIS can be. They install the same. Setup up the same in anything from 98FE to XP Pro. Leave ME out of all this because it is in a world all its own.

    And with NIS the AV and Firewall use a lot of SHARED files and if one goes haywire it can disrupt the other. I much prefer standalone programs " whar one has nuttin to do wid da udder. "

    No we are not talking past each other. And all we are really doing is stating different ways of doing things. And showing others the different ways. And our resaons for the different way

    I like it myself.

    You say it make no difference whether NIS is installed first or last.

    I say it does. I say I like to get every bit of protection that I can installed BEFORE the machine ever goes online THE FRIST TIME. And then I do not need to worry about unplugging the Modem or anythings else.

    The protection is available why work around it. Use it to the fullest. Install it and let it help. Which it does.

    However, during the installation of software it is recommended to disable the firewall and anti virus software. Since a fresh install means installing a lot of software, I see no reason to install them just to disable them.

    I myself have never disabled AV to install anything. How ever I am not saying that that is a better idea though. I have just never had a problem. Kerio and AVG have never bothered a thing. NAV did. Accorrding to the way I had it set. If I had it set to check all files then it good be a real PITA.

    If I do a clean install ( which I have not done in years other than this install of XP I do unplug the Modem. But The FIRST items I install are AV and Firewall. And when they are installed the modem is plugged back in and AV and Firewall updates optained.

    Now by doing it that way if the OOPS !! I forgot situation arises my backside is covered very nicely.

    Also you may be forgetting something else about the Firewall. With it disabled ANY BODY can get into your machine at any time. And all behind yours back.

    I like to lock the door BEFORE the thieves get in.

    That is my BIGGEST reason for getting the Firewall in ASAP. But of course with a Router that part is not as much af a concern.

    Coffee time. I checked here before even getting my first cup.

    BillyBob
     
    Last edited: 2003/08/22
  14. 2003/08/22
    BillyBob Lifetime Subscription

    BillyBob Inactive

    Joined:
    2002/01/07
    Messages:
    6,048
    Likes Received:
    0
    I forgot about this.

    What has that got to do with when NIS is installed ?

    You are talking past me on that.

    BB
     
  15. 2003/08/22
    charlesvar

    charlesvar Inactive Alumni

    Joined:
    2002/02/18
    Messages:
    7,024
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hello Johanna,

    "Still trying to figure out why some software (like Word!) thinks it needs to call home regularly. "

    Its Word's update feature. I've disabled it on 9X and I've done that on XP.

    Regards - Charles
     
  16. 2003/08/22
    Johanna

    Johanna Inactive Alumni

    Joined:
    2003/03/08
    Messages:
    2,402
    Likes Received:
    2
    Yeah, but Charles, how much updating can a product like that need??? I've disabled the auto update on everything, too, but in my nightmares I picture a demented soul calling on every internet enabled application to revolt and bring the pc experience as we know it to a screeching halt.

    My point was only that with the tattletale, no internet activity occurs without a record, or an alert if you want it. My mom's new HP, fully loaded, came out of the box with 143 internet enabled trash software apps, and dumping all that garbage speeded things up quite a bit. Her experience is why I will never tell anyone to get XP Home, either, but I'll save that for another thread! LOL!

    Cheers from Ohio!
    Johanna
     
  17. 2003/08/22
    charlesvar

    charlesvar Inactive Alumni

    Joined:
    2002/02/18
    Messages:
    7,024
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hi Johanna,

    Looking for updates, just in case there is one, you never know :)

    Seriously, as you pointed out, lots of apps behave this way, so this not exclusive to MS. Agreed, a huge PIA.

    Regards - Charles

    BTW, almost forgot, the only way I was able to disable Word's "emissary" to Redmond, was to change the object's name by one character, otherwise just kept restarting itself. In this way, MS is unique, they own the environment.

    Regards - Charles
     
    Last edited: 2003/08/22
  18. 2003/08/22
    Johanna

    Johanna Inactive Alumni

    Joined:
    2003/03/08
    Messages:
    2,402
    Likes Received:
    2
    I just use Norton to block those connections, instead. Like I said earlier, there is no other software other than Symantec's (that I know of- correct me if I am wrong!) that can boss M$.
    Johanna
    not paranoid, just conservative...
     
  19. 2003/08/22
    BillyBob Lifetime Subscription

    BillyBob Inactive

    Joined:
    2002/01/07
    Messages:
    6,048
    Likes Received:
    0
    "Still trying to figure out why some software (like Word!) thinks it needs to call home regularly. "

    MORE & MORE software is being set to Call Home all by itself.

    Its Word's update feature. I've disabled it on 9X and I've done that on XP.

    Yes, that choice is available. But it DOES NOT always hold with everything. The Blocking by the Firewall does. I have had it hold untill I restarted the machine just to find it back to the default. And it seems that if it is blocked by the Firewall then the Auto Update won't even run because it can't make a connection

    The ONLY software I allow to Auto Update is my AVG7 Anti-Virus. That to me is the most important one. And I am not so sure that I have not dis-abled that too. Or changed a setting. It has not come up yet today. And maybe the machine was not on at the time it is set for. Gotta check into that.

    Johanna

    In regards to your notes on your Moms' machine.

    Yes they do come pre-loaded with a LOT of extra stuff that most of us may not use. But do not blame that on XP Home or Pro. That is vender doing. It is so called added features by the Vender. But the basic Windows OS is supposed to be the same. ( I wonder but can not really say it is not )

    BillyBob
     
  20. 2003/08/22
    charlesvar

    charlesvar Inactive Alumni

    Joined:
    2002/02/18
    Messages:
    7,024
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hey BillyBob,

    "Yes, that choice is available. But it DOES NOT always hold with everything. The Blocking by the Firewall does "

    Yes, of course. I just don't want anything running if not used.

    There are exceptions, the lastest Google Toolbar which has an auto-upate feature. It's a BHO, bypassing the firewall unless the firewall has a component blocking feature such as ZAP. Never used Kerio or Symantecs firewall so don't know if they have that feature or not.

    Regards - Charles

    I'm using Sygate v5.1 free on XP, no component blocking, use SSM http://maxcomputing.narod.ru/ssme.html?lang
    for that sort of thing.
     
    Last edited: 2003/08/22
  21. 2003/08/24
    Christer

    Christer Geek Member Staff

    Joined:
    2002/12/17
    Messages:
    6,585
    Likes Received:
    74
    Good evening (a few days later, sorry about that) BillyBob!

    I qoute from Your post:

    I told You we were talking past eachother ...... :D ......

    I´ll refresh Your memory by quoting one of my earlier posts:

    If I install the Norton stuff last, then using Ghost I have no uninstall issue. If I roll back one step I have my system (almost) intact but without the Norton stuff.

    If I should have problems with any Norton component, possibly affecting the "package ", I just restore using Image #3 including the Norton stuff. I had to do it once when using WinME but as You point out, it wasn´t necessarily a Norton fault with ME involved ...... I think that is what You meant by Your wish to leave ME out of the discussion.

    Of course, I keep Image #3 up-to-date by reimaging on a regular basis.

    If I would consider trying AVG and Kerio, then I would only have to roll back to Image #2 without the Norton stuff and have a clean registry (in that respect). Then I´d install the new software.

    If I hadn´t used Ghost and the the described strategy, then I agree that anti virus and firewall should go first because, if the applications are to be uninstalled the "normal" way, then it doesn´t matter which goes in first or last.

    The only draw-back is that if I roll back to Image #2, either to install a new version of the Norton stuff or any other software, then I would have to redo all the Windows and other software updates. That why I said "(almost) intact" a few lines above.

    However, it beats going back to square one!

    Christer
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.