1. You are viewing our forum as a guest. For full access please Register. WindowsBBS.com is completely free, paid for by advertisers and donations.

No bootloader for Windows?

Discussion in 'PC Hardware' started by catilley1092, 2009/09/29.

  1. 2009/09/29
    catilley1092

    catilley1092 Well-Known Member Thread Starter

    Joined:
    2009/08/13
    Messages:
    68
    Likes Received:
    8
    On another post, I was asking about running a Windows 2000 Pro as a second OS with XP Pro SP3 that I already have on my Dell Latitude D610. I have over 80GB of free space on my drive. However, another member stated that I would need to install the oldest OS first, then XP, then need a separate bootloader on top of that. Not second guessing the other member's response, but seeking a second opinion. Is this true? On my older laptop (Latitude C640), I have Windows 2000 Pro, Linux Mint and Ubuntu, all on a 40GB drive and it runs flawlessly. When I bought that laptop to learn Linux on, it had XP Pro on it and not needing a second one, I placed Win 2K on it, followed by the other two. All I want is a second option on my main laptop, so if one goes bad, I'll have the other. And if the member who advised me is right, how can a billionaire corporation like Microsoft let all these upstarts out do them. No simple bootloader? Firefox is gaining on them rapidly in the browser department, a strong second place now. And they are staffed mostly by volunteers and are largely funded by donations. How can this happen with all the money that Microsoft has? I guess I better stop, I'm not a Microsoft basher, but I'm beginning to question their intelligence on things. If they wanted to, they could have built a "lite" Windows 7 for older laptops, but they didn't. I would've bought it had they did. Anyway, I just want a second opinion on this. If what the other member said is true, it's not worth messing with. Thank you for reading my thread and hopefully, there's a solution for my question.
     
  2. 2009/09/30
    mattman

    mattman Inactive Alumni

    Joined:
    2002/06/10
    Messages:
    8,198
    Likes Received:
    63
    The Windows bootloaders are backwards compatible, not forward. One reason I see is that if something goes wrong with a forward looking bootloader, the whole system can be wrecked.

    You might find that if you get a bug in your current system you probably won't have any alternative than to start formatting.

    When they work, they work well, when they don't I think you will find you are on your own.

    Me, I follow the recommendations, but now that I can boot to individual HDDs using the BIOS, I put different OSes on different HDDs, that avoids bootloaders altogether.

    Matt
     

  3. to hide this advert.

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.