1. You are viewing our forum as a guest. For full access please Register. WindowsBBS.com is completely free, paid for by advertisers and donations.

NAV2003 CommonClient - what is it?

Discussion in 'Security and Privacy' started by charlesvar, 2003/12/16.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. 2003/12/16
    charlesvar

    charlesvar Inactive Alumni Thread Starter

    Joined:
    2002/02/18
    Messages:
    7,024
    Likes Received:
    0
    I reinstalled XP for someone and they put NAV2003 on. Out of curiosity, went looking for CommonClient's function and ran into a "brick wall" on what it's function is.

    Below are two samples of references that I ran across about CC, but here and in others, not one word about what it does.

    http://service1.symantec.com/SUPPOR...s 2000/Me/98/XP&src=csm&pcode=nav&svy=&csm=no

    http://www.derkeiler.com/Newsgroups/comp.security.firewalls/2003-06/1414.html

    Does anyone have a clue as to what it does?

    In May, when my current NAV2002 subscription is up for renewal, if I can't stick with 2002, will go elsewhere. Currently run NOD32 on WinME because of the light load on 9X resources. On XP, if not NAV, will use yet a third brand.

    Regards - Charles
     
  2. 2003/12/16
    Christer

    Christer Geek Member Staff

    Joined:
    2002/12/17
    Messages:
    6,585
    Likes Received:
    74
    Hi Charles!

    Maybe I´m pointing out the obvious but Common Client is kind of a "supervisor" which sees to that all parts of Norton is running as supposed.

    Go to TASK LIST PROGRAMS and search for ccApp, ccEvtMgr and CCPRYSVC which might add to the confusion ...... ;) ...... !

    Christer
     

  3. to hide this advert.

  4. 2003/12/16
    charlesvar

    charlesvar Inactive Alumni Thread Starter

    Joined:
    2002/02/18
    Messages:
    7,024
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hi Christer,

    Thanks, I overlooked the obvious place to look.

    My original impression of this and NAV subsequent to NAV2002, especially of 2004, is that of bloat, just shear inefficiency.

    CC creates a BHO, wants to get on line from startup, and from your reference, can't control it the way LiveUpdate could be.

    All in all, a vast improvement - Not!

    Regards - Charles
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.