1. You are viewing our forum as a guest. For full access please Register. WindowsBBS.com is completely free, paid for by advertisers and donations.

aol email mystery

Discussion in 'General Internet' started by Wiry, 2003/10/15.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. 2003/10/15
    Wiry Lifetime Subscription

    Wiry Inactive Thread Starter

    Joined:
    2002/01/17
    Messages:
    306
    Likes Received:
    0
    I recently installed aol 8 on my win98 running about 96mb of ram.
    Sometimes the email I send gets garbled and I have to send it again. Other times, when I try to print out an attachment, it prints garbled the first time, then ok the second time. Has anyone had this problem? Should I have more ram? I don't seem to have the problem outside of aol in my regular programs so I think it is some kind of problem specific to aol.

    thanks
     
    Wiry,
    #1
  2. 2003/10/15
    Newt

    Newt Inactive

    Joined:
    2002/01/07
    Messages:
    10,974
    Likes Received:
    2
    I'm not sure AOL has every quite gotten the hang of HTML email. Text does fine. Rich text does pretty well. HTML - still sorta iffy at times.

    Same with pictures.

    I have read lots of places that AOL8 was optimized for broadband. Do you have that or dial-up?

    And the only real suggestion I could make is to switch browser/mail packages if you can. Again from reading (don't and won't use either one) MSN8 seems to come out on top in the head-to-head comparisons with AOL8.
     
    Newt,
    #2

  3. to hide this advert.

  4. 2003/10/28
    Wiry Lifetime Subscription

    Wiry Inactive Thread Starter

    Joined:
    2002/01/17
    Messages:
    306
    Likes Received:
    0
    Thought I would give you a follow up. 90 mgs of ram isn't enough for aol8 broadband. Should be at least 128 mg of ram.
    Installed more and it fixed everything.
     
    Wiry,
    #3
  5. 2003/10/28
    Newt

    Newt Inactive

    Joined:
    2002/01/07
    Messages:
    10,974
    Likes Received:
    2
    Glad you got that one figured out. But horrible to think any app designed to run on 98 would require that amount of memory. Ah well. Lucky thing that memory is pretty cheap these days. :D
     
    Newt,
    #4
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.