1. You are viewing our forum as a guest. For full access please Register. WindowsBBS.com is completely free, paid for by advertisers and donations.

Advice wanted on securing a Windows 2000 Server NAT computer

Discussion in 'Windows Server System' started by BadBoy House, 2007/06/01.

  1. 2007/06/01
    BadBoy House

    BadBoy House Inactive Thread Starter

    Joined:
    2007/05/30
    Messages:
    28
    Likes Received:
    0
    At work I our internet is shared throughout the office via a BT router connected to a Windows 2000 Server NAT configured computer which in turn connects to our switch.

    I've got a problem being discussed on this thread about it having a problem with a virus/spyware/malware.


    What concerns me most is that even though the system has full anti virus protection and all windows updates installed it can still get malcious code on it and more to the point keep getting it back.

    We've never had this problem before - the system was formatted as annual maintenance a few months ago.

    thanks in advance
     
  2. 2007/06/02
    ReggieB

    ReggieB Inactive Alumni

    Joined:
    2004/05/12
    Messages:
    2,786
    Likes Received:
    2
    Personally, I'd NAT at the router rather than at the server. Use a private network space between the server and the router. So if your network is using 10.0.0.0 IP addresses, use 192.168.0.0 addresses between the server and the router. If you are using 192.168.0.0 internally, use 10.0.0.0 address between the server and router.

    I'd also alway recommend that business networks use a hardware firewall to secure their internet connection. Something from SonicWall, Watchguard or a Cisco PIX are all relatively cheap and straightforward to set up.

    What services are you providing TO the internet. Are you allowing remote users to connect in to the server to access web pages, e-mail or other services?

    The other thing is that Windows update tends only to patch the operating system. If you are running other services they need to be updated separately.

    Lastly, if it is e-mail relaying that's using up your bandwidth, that can be a setting problem rather than virus.
     

  3. to hide this advert.

  4. 2007/06/04
    noahdfear

    noahdfear Inactive

    Joined:
    2003/04/06
    Messages:
    12,178
    Likes Received:
    15
    IMO, the most important step in securing your network server is in securing the workstations that connect to it, and carefully selecting the permissions and shares given to those workstations and users.

    Use a router eqipped with SPI, and make sure it is active.
    Use a software firewall on all workstations.
    Keep all workstations up-to-date, not only with Windows Updates, but also with Office updates, Java machine, etc.
    Use group policies to restrict user actions.....lockdown the workstations.... Allow only what's needed for work.
    Tweak IE settings on workstations ...... max temp file storage, cookie handling, etc.
    When configured as RRAS with NAT, use the strongest encryption that will work effectively for your clients.

    At my workplace, I limit the internet activity through the server by assigning all workstations with the router address as the default gateway (wired as modem>router>switch>all computers). Server acts as a DNS and DHCP server for LAN clients, as well as RRAS for remote clients.
     
  5. 2007/06/05
    ReggieB

    ReggieB Inactive Alumni

    Joined:
    2004/05/12
    Messages:
    2,786
    Likes Received:
    2
    IMO - only one major objection noahdfear: you must secure the server. The server is a trusted resource. If it gets compromised you have big problems. Otherwise a valid solution.

    My preference would be :
    • a dedicated hardware firewall and relax on the firewalls on each PC
    • install a centrally managed AV solution and make sure all PC are kept up to date rather than concentrating on Windows update.
    • I prefer handling VPN at the firewall rather than on the server.
     
  6. 2007/06/05
    noahdfear

    noahdfear Inactive

    Joined:
    2003/04/06
    Messages:
    12,178
    Likes Received:
    15
    @ ReggieB,

    I didn't mean to imply in any way that securing the server is not important, or doesn't need to be done. On the contrary, several of the recommendations I gave concerned securing the server as well as the workstations.

     
  7. 2007/06/06
    ReggieB

    ReggieB Inactive Alumni

    Joined:
    2004/05/12
    Messages:
    2,786
    Likes Received:
    2
    That makes sense.

    All agreed then :D
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.