1. You are viewing our forum as a guest. For full access please Register. WindowsBBS.com is completely free, paid for by advertisers and donations.

Additional network outlets vs sharing one outlet in a switch??

Discussion in 'Networking (Hardware & Software)' started by markjrees, 2008/04/18.

  1. 2008/04/18
    markjrees

    markjrees Inactive Thread Starter

    Joined:
    2003/09/02
    Messages:
    49
    Likes Received:
    0
    We've got a room in the office that we're thinking about putting our servers in.

    At present there are no network outlets in the room - we've got 3 servers to potentially put in there.

    My initial feeling is that we have 3 network points put in - as all 3 systems are our servers I'm not that keen on them sharing a single outlet via a 4 port switch - which is the alternative.

    Does anyone have an opinion on this?
     
  2. 2008/04/18
    ReggieB

    ReggieB Inactive Alumni

    Joined:
    2004/05/12
    Messages:
    2,786
    Likes Received:
    2
    3 outlets would be best. Otherwise all three servers are sharing a single connection into the network, and that connection will be a bottle neck.

    Also running three cables through a hole (or set of trunking) is not really much more difficult that running one. Its not really much of a job to put in two more. I wouldn't be surprised if a cabler charged you about the same to run three connections through as one.

    With that in mind - run five or six through. I guarantee that in a year or two's time you'll want to add more servers or network devices and regret not giving yourself spare connections to build on. It's generally a good rule of thumb to think how many connections you want, and then double it.

    If you have no other choice, make that single connection the fastest one in the network. For example, if you have a 100 Mb/s network, make the connection into the server room a gigabit link and connect the servers together via a small gigabit switch.

    However, three gigabit links giving each server a gigabit link into the 100Mb/s network would be a better solution.
     

  3. to hide this advert.

  4. 2008/04/18
    Scott Smith

    Scott Smith Inactive Alumni

    Joined:
    2002/01/12
    Messages:
    1,950
    Likes Received:
    4
    Fiber back to the main switch with Gigabit switches on both ends. ;)
     
  5. 2008/04/21
    ReggieB

    ReggieB Inactive Alumni

    Joined:
    2004/05/12
    Messages:
    2,786
    Likes Received:
    2
    I love fibre. However, I would point out that fibre is only going to be worth doing in this case if you use it to provide bandwidth that would otherwise not be possible. That is, if fibre allows you to run a 10Gb/s connection between your gigabit switches or makes it easier to multiplex - so you get multiple connections into the new server room, then fibre is a good option.

    If you put in fibre and run at the same speed as you could over copper, you haven't really achieved much.

    If it is a choice between a single 1Gb/s fibre connection, or multiple copper connections, the multiple copper connections would be better.
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.