1. You are viewing our forum as a guest. For full access please Register. WindowsBBS.com is completely free, paid for by advertisers and donations.

Disappointing Memory Boost?

Discussion in 'PC Hardware' started by Rista, 2007/03/18.

  1. 2007/03/18
    Rista

    Rista Well-Known Member Thread Starter

    Joined:
    2005/05/21
    Messages:
    82
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hi Folks,

    Originally there was a single stick of memory inside from Swissbit (also low density) which was 1 single stick of 512 MB RAM, PC 2700 DDR-SD RAM, Timings: 2.5-3-3-7

    Below the Benchmark readings from Everest Home Edition done after flashing a BIOS Update last summer:

    Memory Read: 2401 MB/s
    Memory Write: 941 Mb/s
    Memory Latency: 117.3 ns


    As I felt that it was high time to install some memory, as it is getting tougher day by day on the consumption of memory, I just bought 2 sticks of:

    G. Skill F1-3200PHU2-GBNS, Timings 2.5-3-3-6.

    So I installed the made in Taiwan Sticks and noticed an immediate difference in the speed the programs come up which is positive, but would not want to write home about it. So I made some Benchmarks again with Everest and here are the readings:

    Memory Read: 2897 MB/s
    Memory Write: 1004 MB/s
    Memory Latency: 100.8 ns


    I think the details below will give you a fair idea about the system and I will gladly supply further details if you need, I have Everest Home and also PC Wizard 2006.

    CPU Properties
    CPU Type Intel Pentium 4HT
    CPU Alias Northwood Hyper Threading
    CPU Stepping D1
    Engineering Sample No
    CPUID CPU Name Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.20GHz
    CPUID Revision 00000F29h

    CPU Speed
    CPU Clock 3198.53 MHz (original: 3200 MHz)
    CPU Multiplier 16.0x
    CPU FSB 199.91 MHz (original: 200 MHz)
    Memory Bus 199.91 MHz

    CPU Cache
    L1 Trace Cache 12K Instructions
    L1 Data Cache 8 KB
    L2 Cache 512 KB (On-Die, ECC, ATC, Full-Speed)

    Motherboard Properties
    Motherboard ID 06/18/2005-PT800-8237-6A7L2M4DC-00
    Motherboard Name MSI MS-7042

    Chipset Properties
    Motherboard Chipset VIA Apollo PT880
    Memory Timings 2.5-3-3-6 (CL-RCD-RP-RAS)
    Command Rate (CR) 2T

    SPD Memory Modules
    DIMM1: G Skill NS 1 GB PC3200 DDR SDRAM (2.5-3-3-6 @ 200 MHz)
    DIMM2: G Skill NS 1 GB PC3200 DDR SDRAM (2.5-3-3-6 @ 200 MHz)

    BIOS Properties
    System BIOS Date 06/18/05
    Video BIOS Date 10/22/03
    Award BIOS Type Phoenix - AwardBIOS v6.00PG
    Award BIOS Message W7042MLN V1.34 061805 15:23:47 MEDIONPC LN
    DMI BIOS Version 6.00 PG

    Graphics Processor Properties
    DirectX 4.09.00.0904 (DirectX 9.0c)
    Video Adapter nVIDIA GeForce FX 5200 (MSI FX5200)
    GPU Code Name NV34 (AGP 8x 10DE / 0322, Rev A1)
    GPU Clock 250 MHz
    Memory Clock 202 MHz

    Sensor Properties
    Tsystem 40 °C (104 °F)
    Tcpu 34 °C (93 °F)
    Fcpu 1406 RPM
    Vcore 1.50 V
    Vio 3.26 V

    So now I would really like to know how come there is hardly a big difference in the Readings with a 512 MB Swissbit Stick and a G. Skill 2 x 1024 MB.

    What can be done to improve the poor performance of this machine?

    Regards,

    Rista
     
  2. 2007/03/18
    TonyT

    TonyT SuperGeek Staff

    Joined:
    2002/01/18
    Messages:
    9,072
    Likes Received:
    400
    I would think that the performance is quite an improvement!
    remember, it's still a clock speed of pc2700. (bottleneck point)
     

  3. to hide this advert.

  4. 2007/03/18
    Rista

    Rista Well-Known Member Thread Starter

    Joined:
    2005/05/21
    Messages:
    82
    Likes Received:
    0
    Thanks for your response TonyT.

    And what determines the PC 2700 bottleneck in this case?
     
  5. 2007/03/18
    Chiles4

    Chiles4 Inactive

    Joined:
    2002/01/09
    Messages:
    654
    Likes Received:
    1
    It sounds from your post that you went from running your memory at 166Mhz (PC2700) to running your new RAM at 200Mhz(PC3200). That's a 20% increase in bus speed. Interestingly, your memory read speed had a 20% boost as well.

    Latency is probably more a function of the RAM itself and its settings and not your bus speed.
     
  6. 2007/03/18
    Rista

    Rista Well-Known Member Thread Starter

    Joined:
    2005/05/21
    Messages:
    82
    Likes Received:
    0
    According to the tech person (a year and a half or so ago!) the manufacturer had installed that memory (PC 2700) being far cheaper at the time compared to PC 3200 memory. He could also have used PC 2100 if he had wanted to. Therefore I wouldn't want use that as a yardstick to measure the increment in performance.

    Having just shelled out Euro 152 here in Germany (ca. 204 USD! in the US on NewEgg only 154 USD) is giving me a feeling of having made a very bad investment. I just got it yesterday and may be I can even return it (I haven't spoken to their customer-support yet, but would prefer to keep and explore if there is a possibility of improving it somehow. I am not into games nor into overclocking.

    I had these for my daughter's desktop actually, but she won't settle for anything less than a Sony Laptop with Vista on it! So it would seem I am stuck with it unless I find a paddle to go down the creek!

    Would therefore appreciate any ideas in those directions at the moment..

    Rista :(
     
  7. 2007/03/19
    Chiles4

    Chiles4 Inactive

    Joined:
    2002/01/09
    Messages:
    654
    Likes Received:
    1
    I guess I'm not sure what your goal is. Are you looking for a specific system throughput mark? Or simply a feeling of "hey this system is really fast! ".

    There are two upgrades that have never impressed me. One is a cpu upgrade and the other is a memory upgrade. With RAM, you simply need an optimum amount to prevent it from bottlenecking your system and causing too much reliance on your hard drive.

    Two upgrades that have often impressed me are video card and hard drive. No component will bog down your system more than a slow hard drive and no component will make a bigger difference in one's gaming (if one games) than a new video card. Upgrading cpu and RAM has always resulted in a "eh, that's it?" sort of feeling.

    Maybe I'm waxing philosophical a bit here but I don't think you're going to get a "feeling" of improved speed with a RAM upgrade.

    At the moment, the "fastest-feeling" PC in the house is a Socket A rig running an Athlon XP mobile at 2.0Ghz. It reacts much faster than my two Socket 939 PCs even though it has half the RAM. The reason...it has so much less crud(software) loaded on it.
     
  8. 2007/03/19
    TonyT

    TonyT SuperGeek Staff

    Joined:
    2002/01/18
    Messages:
    9,072
    Likes Received:
    400
    I agree re ram & cpu upgrades result in a feeling of "is that all? ".
    But ram upgrades can result in a noticable difference in programs opening & programs' response time to user input.

    I believe your investment was well worth it! 20% increase is considerable!

    Realize that a 100% increase is impossible, even if change ram, cpu, video card & hd. A brand new top of the line system won't result in that much increase. You did well.
     
  9. 2007/03/19
    Rista

    Rista Well-Known Member Thread Starter

    Joined:
    2005/05/21
    Messages:
    82
    Likes Received:
    0
    Exactly, that is how I feel about this upgrade!
     
  10. 2007/03/19
    TonyT

    TonyT SuperGeek Staff

    Joined:
    2002/01/18
    Messages:
    9,072
    Likes Received:
    400
    The biggest noticable difference is when multitasking, using a half dozen big apps at same time.
     
  11. 2007/03/19
    Rista

    Rista Well-Known Member Thread Starter

    Joined:
    2005/05/21
    Messages:
    82
    Likes Received:
    0
    There is one thing that was baffling me is that the Memory Controller on the MoBo is Dual Channel (128 bit) but in the Active Mode it is showing as Single hannel (64 bit). As a result of this it is boosting up the Performance and the corresponding Readings only half way up. I have confirmed that the MoBo is Dual Channel which also Everest is showing as below:

    North Bridge Properties
    North Bridge VIA Apollo PT880
    Revision 00
    Package Type 829 Pin HSBGA
    Package Size 3.75 cm x 3.75 cm
    Core Voltage 1.5 V
    In-Order Queue Depth 12

    Memory Controller
    Type Dual Channel (128-bit)
    Active Mode Single Channel (64-bit)

    Bank Interleave 4-way

    Memory Timings
    CAS Latency (CL) 2.5T
    RAS To CAS Delay (tRCD) 3T
    RAS Precharge (tRP) 3T
    RAS Active Time (tRAS) 6T
    Row Refresh Cycle Time (tRFC) 14T
    Command Rate (CR) 2T
    Write Recovery Time (tWR) 3T

    Memory Slots
    DRAM Slot #1 1024 MB (DDR SDRAM)
    DRAM Slot #2 1024 MB (DDR SDRAM)

    AGP Controller
    AGP Version 3.05
    AGP Status Enabled
    AGP Device MSI FX5200 (MS-8919)
    AGP Aperture Size 128 MB
    Supported AGP Speeds 1x, 2x, 4x, 8x
    Current AGP Speed 8x
    Fast-Write Supported, Enabled
    Side Band Addressing Supported, Enabled

    Chipset Manufacturer
    Company Name VIA Technologies, Inc.
    Product Information http://www.via.com.tw/en/products/chipsets
    Driver Download http://www.viaarena.com/?PageID=2

    Now I need to know why, and subsequently, how to amend the error or malfunction!!!

    Rista
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.