1. You are viewing our forum as a guest. For full access please Register. WindowsBBS.com is completely free, paid for by advertisers and donations.

Explorer.exe at 50% (WINXP SP2)

Discussion in 'Malware and Virus Removal Archive' started by Magia, 2006/11/15.

  1. 2006/11/15
    Magia

    Magia Inactive Thread Starter

    Joined:
    2006/11/15
    Messages:
    37
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hey all!
    I just read about a problem i have on my PC at home. It is whenever i am online, i get explorer.exe at 50% cpu usage and i cant use it. i end the process and start it again but it only works for 2 minutes or so.

    Whenever explorer.exe isnt running, it usually make firefox 50% instead.
    I have found a solution to it!

    I read on the XYZ forums that it was from hackers coming from an IP such as 204.16.108.*. (the * represents any number from 1 to 300) and it is coming from ports 1025 to 1030

    I tried to make a rule on Sygate Personal Firewall Pro but it only allowed me to put a 2 digit number as the last varying number.

    Put simply, I was attempting to put the rule as:
    Block all incoming connections from.....204.16.108.1-204.16.108.300..... but it would only work with 204.16.108.1-204.16.108.30

    I dont understand! Can i make a rule in windows itself or would using the windows firewall fix the problem.

    BTW I have dial-up and windows updates take a long time to download so i refuse to use Windows Firewall just incase it is not safe. Am I right?

    I have
    3800+ Dual Core AMD CPU
    2x 256MB nVidia 6600GTs
    250GB Western Digital SATA HDD
    CD/DVD Burner LG

    ANY help would be greatly appreciated
     
  2. 2006/11/16
    mailman Lifetime Subscription

    mailman Geek Member

    Joined:
    2004/01/17
    Messages:
    1,901
    Likes Received:
    11
    Hi, Magia. Welcome to Windows BBS. :)

    I expect you cannot put 300 in the last part of the IP address because 255 is the highest valid number for any part of the IP address.

    You should be able to block all connections in the following range:
    • 204.16.108.1 - 204.16.108.255
     
    Last edited: 2006/11/16

  3. to hide this advert.

  4. 2006/11/16
    Magia

    Magia Inactive Thread Starter

    Joined:
    2006/11/15
    Messages:
    37
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ooops Didnt know

    So there is no way of ever getting an incomming connections from 204.16.108.300. Cool, thanks for your help.

    Now what type of rule do i use to stop incoming connections to my computer for the IP's 204.16.108.1-204.16.108.255?

    I know how to set the rule but do I make the rule on all ports? and do i use UDP or TCP?

    By the way, what are the differences between TCP and UDP and what are they used for?
     
  5. 2006/11/16
    mailman Lifetime Subscription

    mailman Geek Member

    Joined:
    2004/01/17
    Messages:
    1,901
    Likes Received:
    11
    If you do not have any legitimate dealings with the IP: 204.16.108.* (which I could not resolve to a domain name, apparently located in the USA according to Port Explorer), then I expect you can block all ports (both TCP and UDP) from the 204.16.108.1 - 204.16.108.255 range without any negative effect on your computer.

    I am not very knowledgeable about TCP and UDP protocols but here are some links for learning more about TCP and UDP to get you started.
     
    Last edited: 2006/11/16
  6. 2006/11/17
    mailman Lifetime Subscription

    mailman Geek Member

    Joined:
    2004/01/17
    Messages:
    1,901
    Likes Received:
    11
    By the way, I think 204.16.108.0 is also a valid IP address. Therefore, I expect you should specify the range as 204.16.108.0 - 204.16.108.255 in your firewall (all ports, both TCP and UDP) to block all incoming connections from the 204.16.108.* domain.
     
  7. 2006/11/19
    mailman Lifetime Subscription

    mailman Geek Member

    Joined:
    2004/01/17
    Messages:
    1,901
    Likes Received:
    11
    Hi, Magia.

    I used Port Explorer to perform a "Whois" on 204.16.108.1 and I am providing the following results in case you're interested in investigating further (assuming your incoming connection attempts were, in fact, from the 204.16.108.0 - 204.16.108.255 range).

    ========

    [FONT= "Courier New"]OrgName: MScript, Inc
    OrgID: MSCRI
    Address: 108 Bank st
    Address: 5th floor
    City: Waterbury
    StateProv: CT
    PostalCode: 06702
    Country: US

    NetRange: 204.16.108.0 - 204.16.111.255
    CIDR: 204.16.108.0/22
    NetName: MSCRIPT-NETWORK
    NetHandle: NET-204-16-108-0-1
    Parent: NET-204-0-0-0-0
    NetType: Direct Allocation
    Comment:
    RegDate: 2005-10-28
    Updated: 2005-10-28

    RTechHandle: MGO26-ARIN
    RTechName: Golino, Mark
    RTechPhone: +1-203-755-5454
    RTechEmail: mgolino_*.AT.*_mscript.net

    OrgTechHandle: MGO26-ARIN
    OrgTechName: Golino, Mark
    OrgTechPhone: +1-203-755-5454
    OrgTechEmail: mgolino_*.AT.*_mscript.net

    # ARIN WHOIS database, last updated 2006-11-17 19:10[/FONT]

    ========

    I edited the e-mail addresses above to help prevent bots from harvesting the email addresses. Since you suspect mscript.net as the source of your unwanted incoming connection attempts, I would advise AGAINST e-mailing "mgolino" anyway at least until you have verified mscript.net is not malicious in general and the Whois information above is not bogus.

    BTW, Port Explorer is a very handy, full-featured program for monitoring your computer's TCP/UDP traffic. The 30-day trial/demo version is apparently fully functional (according to DiamondCS).
     
    Last edited: 2006/11/19
  8. 2006/11/20
    Magia

    Magia Inactive Thread Starter

    Joined:
    2006/11/15
    Messages:
    37
    Likes Received:
    0
    Thanks for the help.

    OK thanks for the help. ill definatly reccomend the site to my fellow classmates
     
  9. 2006/11/20
    Magia

    Magia Inactive Thread Starter

    Joined:
    2006/11/15
    Messages:
    37
    Likes Received:
    0
    Problem!

    ok, i went further and i made a rule to block :
    204.16.108.0 - 204.16.111.255 (just to make sure)

    explorer still runs at 50%, when explorer.exe is not running, it jumps to firefox.exe. so not only is explorer stuffing up, but so is firefox. If firefox isnt running, then it laggs up RKLauncher (Mac Emulation Software)

    Please help me. what do i do to fix the issue?
     
  10. 2006/11/20
    Arie

    Arie Administrator Administrator Staff

    Joined:
    2001/12/27
    Messages:
    15,174
    Likes Received:
    412
    Arie,
    #9

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.