1. You are viewing our forum as a guest. For full access please Register. WindowsBBS.com is completely free, paid for by advertisers and donations.

Downloading faster than Uploading....

Discussion in 'Networking (Hardware & Software)' started by hotalot, 2005/11/28.

  1. 2005/11/28
    hotalot

    hotalot Inactive Thread Starter

    Joined:
    2005/11/27
    Messages:
    3
    Likes Received:
    0
    I have two computers running WinXP Pro with gigabit NICs connected with a crossover cable.
    The strange thing is that when uploading a file the speed seems to be limited to 100mbps but, downloading the same file I get 200mbps.

    I've tried several combinations:
    1 - Only tcp/ip with hosts file.
    2 - Only netbios with lmhosts file.
    3 - Nwlink - unbearable low speed, and
    4 - The "regular" Netbios over tcp/ip. This seems to be the fastest option.

    Does anyone know why downloading is faster than uploading?

    Is there any parameter I can tweak to get better performance?

    The NICs are Level One GNC-0105T model and I'm using Cat6 cable.

    Thanks!
     
  2. 2005/11/28
    Dcrypter

    Dcrypter Inactive

    Joined:
    2002/09/19
    Messages:
    158
    Likes Received:
    1
    You dont need entries in your hosts files. Use TCP/IP remove QoS and NetBIOS. Also check your network card connection speed. Set the card to full duplex. Also a thing to know Gig LAN will move data at 120MB/s at burst more consistantly at 95MB/s. The other thing is Windows uses a smaller upload window size. The way windows does a file transfer is really slow and inefficient. Are both computers the same hardware wise? You could be running into hardware latency. If you are just transfering files use a FTP server (filezilla server) its really easy to configure.
     

  3. to hide this advert.

  4. 2005/11/28
    Scott Smith

    Scott Smith Inactive Alumni

    Joined:
    2002/01/12
    Messages:
    1,950
    Likes Received:
    4
    What type of file?

    I believe (though not positive) if it's a compressed file like an mpeg it has to be decompressed and recompressed on the other end. a 750 meg file might be 10 gig uncompressed.
     
  5. 2005/11/28
    hotalot

    hotalot Inactive Thread Starter

    Joined:
    2005/11/27
    Messages:
    3
    Likes Received:
    0
    As I said before I tried all combinations of TCP/IP and Netbios and the fastest is Netbios over TCP. It gives me 20% network utilization, around 200 Mbps (megabits/second) ~ 25MBps downloading.
    I transfer mostly very large (4.4GB) .TS files to my HTPC. Some films like Private Ryan are as big as 24GB, wich I divide into 4.4GB files to backup them in DVDs. This particular film takes 1 hour to transfer over a 100mbs link.
     
  6. 2005/11/28
    Scott Smith

    Scott Smith Inactive Alumni

    Joined:
    2002/01/12
    Messages:
    1,950
    Likes Received:
    4
    Just for kicks and giggles can you get your hands on a gigabit switch and put inbetween?

    I have 2 gigibit PCs here and a gig switch. I'll see what I get tonight.
     
  7. 2005/11/28
    hotalot

    hotalot Inactive Thread Starter

    Joined:
    2005/11/27
    Messages:
    3
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yes, I tried an Encore 8 port gigabit switch. It supports jumbo frame 9k and 12k, and a Dlink 1008 switch - no jumbo frame supported.

    Results were the same.

    Funny it seems that the OS is limiting the bandwidth to 100mps cause it stops exactly at 10% network utilization, cpu doesn't go above 20% utilization.
    If the problem was the hardware downloading would be limited to the same speed, but I get 20% network utilization while downloading a file, cpu goes up to 55% utilization.
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.