1. You are viewing our forum as a guest. For full access please Register. WindowsBBS.com is completely free, paid for by advertisers and donations.

V92 Modem

Discussion in 'PC Hardware' started by Rockit, 2004/12/30.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. 2004/12/30
    Rockit

    Rockit Inactive Thread Starter

    Joined:
    2003/03/23
    Messages:
    464
    Likes Received:
    0
    Does anybody have any knowledge of the V92 standard and being able to recieve phone calls while being online? Also I currently have a ISA Diamond 56k modem that has it's own processer I think? It cost $100 bucks and I usally connect at 44.0kbps. Will this modem (look below) use more of my system resources and will it connect as fast as the one I have now?

    Thanks Allot
    Rockit

    Rebate: US Robotics 56K V.92 Internal PCI Faxmodem $10 at Staples.com

    Staples.com has the US Robotics 56K V.92 Internal PCI Faxmodem for $40 - $30 rebates [Exp 12/31] = $10 with free shipping. [BizRate]
     
  2. 2004/12/31
    Paul

    Paul Inactive

    Joined:
    2002/01/29
    Messages:
    1,293
    Likes Received:
    1
    All I know is that the V92 protocol supports "modem on hold" among some other improvements whilst an incomming call is taken, but your ISP has to support this feature. If it doesn't, then a v92 modem will work fine as a v90 modem. System resources should be the same (or very similar).

    http://www.v92.com

    Connection speed would probably be similar to what you currently get. Maybe the newer modem has slightly better error correction and hardware processing, therefore increasing your connect speed slightly, but usually is dependent on line noise and interference etc.
     
    Paul,
    #2

  3. to hide this advert.

  4. 2004/12/31
    charlesvar

    charlesvar Inactive Alumni

    Joined:
    2002/02/18
    Messages:
    7,024
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hi Rocket,

    I replaced the original modem on my system earlier this year with a US Robotics 56K V.92. Do get better performance from it, largely because it has a bigger buffer.

    The other factors that Paul mentioned have a lot more to with how good the conection speed is. I happen to live in an area where my connections clock in at anywhere from 48 kbps to 52.0; while that sounds great, the actual line speeds can vary greatly from minute to minute despite what the log on speed says.

    I gave you a reference to a program called UpTimer in that RAM thread, it also a has TCP monitor. You can see download/upload speeds in real time.

    Regards - Charles
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.