1. You are viewing our forum as a guest. For full access please Register. WindowsBBS.com is completely free, paid for by advertisers and donations.

Spybot S&D Alert Issues After Norton SystemWorks 2005 Premier Install

Discussion in 'Security and Privacy' started by mailman, 2004/12/24.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. 2004/12/24
    mailman Lifetime Subscription

    mailman Geek Member Thread Starter

    Joined:
    2004/01/17
    Messages:
    1,901
    Likes Received:
    11
    On reboot, immediately after install of Norton SystemWorks 2005 Premier (over NSW 2004 Pro), I was prompted by Spybot S&D (SS&D) whether to allow changes that NSW 2005 apparently made. I allowed the changes.

    Every time I boot, I get the same 3 alerts from SS&D. I attached images of the alerts to this message. Each time I receive the alerts, I "Allow" the changes instead of "Deny" since I expect the changes are desired.

    (I wish I could drag the edges of the SS&D alert window so I can see the whole path.)

    I assume the AcctMgr alert above corresponds to me opting to not install Norton's Password Manager when I installed NSW2005, although I used Password Manager in the 2004 version. I don't wish to use Norton's Password Manager any more because I don't use IE for my web browsing (and I think NSW applies Password Manager only to IE).

    I have read in PacMan's Startups that QD FastAndSafe is not necessary (can be set to use manually) and I expect NSW2005 uses a different program for it's cleanup so I expect QD FastAndSafe deletion is also legitimate.

    Clicking on the "Info" button hasn't been enlightening. I am assuming these changes are legitimate.

    I'm a bit confused on how to interpret SS&D's information in their help documentation.

    Is SS&D merely comparing the changes to the snapshot it took when I installed SS&D a few days prior to the install of NSW 2005 or are the value deletions and the old browser "Local page" somehow getting re-established?

    If SS&D is simply comparing..., I expect the easiest "fix" is to tell SS&D to "Remember this decision" ...in effect, changing the "snapshot ". (This is my hunch but I want to be sure. Is my hunch correct?)

    If the values and start page may be getting re-established, I would prefer making changes to the startup/registry rather than telling SS&D to "Remember" those particular changes every time because it seems if NSW is deleting values (as is the case for the 1st and 2nd alerts), then I don't need those values in my registry any more. If I should make startup/registry changes, please offer suggestions.

    I have other questions about SS&D but I'll post those in another thread. :)
     
    Last edited: 2004/12/24
  2. 2004/12/25
    Bmoore1129

    Bmoore1129 Geek Member

    Joined:
    2002/06/11
    Messages:
    1,675
    Likes Received:
    3
    If I were you I would uninstall all things Norton and Symantec and clean the registry of entries having to do with either. I think Symantec may have a clean out tool for their stuff.

    Then I would start over with a fresh install of the new program. I always had problems with installing something new over something old.

    I don't know why the tea timer won't accept your decisions about allow/deny.
     

  3. to hide this advert.

  4. 2004/12/25
    surferdude2

    surferdude2 Inactive

    Joined:
    2004/07/04
    Messages:
    4,009
    Likes Received:
    23
    Mailman, From your thumbnails posted it looks like you may only need to tag that box labeled "Remember this decision." In theory that would keep it from asking you each time. I think you'll be on safe ground. It surely only applies to the decisions "To Date" and not to future new changes.
     
    Last edited: 2004/12/25
  5. 2004/12/25
    mailman Lifetime Subscription

    mailman Geek Member Thread Starter

    Joined:
    2004/01/17
    Messages:
    1,901
    Likes Received:
    11
    Thanks. I'll wait a few days before doing anything just in case anyone else thinks of anything. Both of the suggestions above sound appealing, though I'll probably try the quick one first.

    Thanks again.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.