1. You are viewing our forum as a guest. For full access please Register. WindowsBBS.com is completely free, paid for by advertisers and donations.

Firefox 1.0 Released

Discussion in 'Firefox, Thunderbird & SeaMonkey' started by Ramona, 2004/11/09.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. 2004/11/09
    Ramona

    Ramona Geek Member Alumni Thread Starter

    Joined:
    2001/12/31
    Messages:
    7,481
    Likes Received:
    2
    Firefox 1.0 is on the FTP site as of 3:20 a.m.

    http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/

    OR

    http://www.mozilla.org/products/firefox/

    I don't see Release Notes yet, as I can't get to a lot of the Firefox pages. Mozilla seems to be updating pages, as I go.

    This is the License Agreement, which should lay to rest the rumors or a EULA:

    FOR TRANSLATIONS OF THIS LICENSE INTO SELECTED LANGUAGES, PLEASE VISIT WWW.MOZILLA.ORG/LICENSING.

    MOZILLA FOUNDATION
    MOZILLA FIREFOX END-USER SOFTWARE LICENSE AGREEMENT

    A SOURCE CODE VERSION OF CERTAIN FIREFOX BROWSER FUNCTIONALITY THAT YOU MAY USE, MODIFY AND DISTRIBUTE IS AVAILABLE TO YOU FREE-OF-CHARGE FROM WWW.MOZILLA.ORG UNDER THE MOZILLA PUBLIC LICENSE and other open source software licenses.
    The accompanying executable code version of Mozilla Firefox and related documentation (the "Product ") is made available to you under the terms of this MOZILLA FIREFOX END-USER SOFTWARE LICENSE AGREEMENT (THE "AGREEMENT "). BY CLICKING THE "ACCEPT" BUTTON, OR BY INSTALLING OR USING THE MOZILLA FIREFOX BROWSER, YOU ARE CONSENTING TO BE BOUND BY THE AGREEMENT. IF YOU DO NOT AGREE TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THIS AGREEMENT, DO NOT CLICK THE "ACCEPT" BUTTON, AND DO NOT INSTALL OR USE ANY PART OF THE MOZILLA FIREFOX BROWSER.
    DURING THE MOZILLA FIREFOX INSTALLATION PROCESS, AND AT LATER TIMES, YOU MAY BE GIVEN THE OPTION OF INSTALLING ADDITIONAL COMPONENTS FROM THIRD-PARTY SOFTWARE PROVIDERS. THE INSTALLATION AND USE OF THOSE THIRD-PARTY COMPONENTS MAY BE GOVERNED BY ADDITIONAL LICENSE AGREEMENTS.
    1. LICENSE GRANT. The Mozilla Foundation grants you a non-exclusive license to use the executable code version of the Product. This Agreement will also govern any software upgrades provided by Mozilla that replace and/or supplement the original Product, unless such upgrades are accompanied by a separate license, in which case the terms of that license will govern.
    2. TERMINATION. If you breach this Agreement your right to use the Product will terminate immediately and without notice, but all provisions of this Agreement except the License Grant (Paragraph 1) will survive termination and continue in effect. Upon termination, you must destroy all copies of the Product.
    3. PROPRIETARY RIGHTS. Portions of the Product are available in source code form under the terms of the Mozilla Public License and other open source licenses (collectively, "Open Source Licenses ") at http://www.mozilla.org. Nothing in this Agreement will be construed to limit any rights granted under the Open Source Licenses. Subject to the foregoing, Mozilla, for itself and on behalf of its licensors, hereby reserves all intellectual property rights in the Product, except for the rights expressly granted in this Agreement. You may not remove or alter any trademark, logo, copyright or other proprietary notice in or on the Product. This license does not grant you any right to use the trademarks, service marks or logos of Mozilla or its licensors.
    4. DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTY. THE PRODUCT IS PROVIDED "AS IS" WITH ALL FAULTS. TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, MOZILLA AND MOZILLA'S LICENSORS HEREBY DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, WHETHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION WARRANTIES THAT THE PRODUCT IS FREE OF DEFECTS, MERCHANTABLE, FIT FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NON-INFRINGING. YOU BEAR ENTIRE RISK AS TO SELECTING THE PRODUCT FOR YOUR PURPOSES AND AS TO THE QUALITY AND PERFORMANCE OF THE PRODUCT. THIS LIMITATION WILL APPLY NOTWITHSTANDING THE FAILURE OF ESSENTIAL PURPOSE OF ANY REMEDY. SOME JURISDICTIONS DO NOT ALLOW THE EXCLUSION OR LIMITATION OF IMPLIED WARRANTIES, SO THIS DISCLAIMER MAY NOT APPLY TO YOU.
    5. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY. EXCEPT AS REQUIRED BY LAW, MOZILLA AND ITS DIRECTORS, LICENSORS, CONTRIBUTORS AND AGENTS (COLLECTIVELY, THE "MOZILLA GROUP ") WILL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY INDIRECT, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF OR IN ANY WAY RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT OR THE USE OF OR INABILITY TO USE THE PRODUCT, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF GOODWILL, WORK STOPPAGE, LOST PROFITS, LOSS OF DATA, AND COMPUTER FAILURE OR MALFUNCTION, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES AND REGARDLESS OF THE THEORY (CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE) UPON WHICH SUCH CLAIM IS BASED. THE MOZILLA GROUP'S COLLECTIVE LIABILITY UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT EXCEED THE GREATER OF $500 (FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS) AND THE FEES PAID BY YOU UNDER THIS LICENSE (IF ANY). SOME JURISDICTIONS DO NOT ALLOW THE EXCLUSION OR LIMITATION OF INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR SPECIAL DAMAGES, SO THIS EXCLUSION AND LIMITATION MAY NOT APPLY TO YOU.
    6. EXPORT CONTROLS. This license is subject to all applicable export restrictions. You must comply with all export and import laws and restrictions and regulations of any United States or foreign agency or authority relating to the Product and its use.
    7. U.S. GOVERNMENT END-USERS. The Product is a "commercial item," as that term is defined in 48 C.F.R. 2.101, consisting of "commercial computer software" and "commercial computer software documentation," as such terms are used in 48 C.F.R. 12.212 (Sept. 1995) and 48 C.F.R. 227.7202 (June 1995). Consistent with 48 C.F.R. 12.212, 48 C.F.R. 27.405(b)(2) (June 1998) and 48 C.F.R. 227.7202, all U.S. Government End Users acquire the Product with only those rights as set forth herein.
    8. MISCELLANEOUS. (a) This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between Mozilla and you concerning the subject matter hereof, and it may only be modified by a written amendment signed by an authorized executive of Mozilla. (b) Except to the extent applicable law, if any, provides otherwise, this Agreement will be governed by the laws of the state of California, U.S.A., excluding its conflict of law provisions. (c) This Agreement will not be governed by the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods. (d) If any part of this Agreement is held invalid or unenforceable, that part will be construed to reflect the parties' original intent, and the remaining portions will remain in full force and effect. (e) A waiver by either party of any term or condition of this Agreement or any breach thereof, in any one instance, will not waive such term or condition or any subsequent breach thereof. (f) Except as required by law, the controlling language of this Agreement is English. (g) You may assign your rights under this Agreement to any party that consents to, and agrees to be bound by, its terms; the Mozilla Foundation may assign its rights under this Agreement without condition. (h) This Agreement will be binding upon and will inure to the benefit of the parties, their successors and permitted assigns.




    Ramona
     
  2. 2004/11/09
    shadowhawk

    shadowhawk Inactive

    Joined:
    2002/01/07
    Messages:
    985
    Likes Received:
    0
    I have the setup file. Is anyone using 1.0 yet? Is it good, stable, reliable, fast, no crashes, glitches, bugs or any little gremlins?

    I'm ready to upgrade, but I wanna be 100% sure.
     

  3. to hide this advert.

  4. 2004/11/09
    James

    James Inactive

    Joined:
    2004/07/14
    Messages:
    1,004
    Likes Received:
    0
    I never understand the language used on ftp servers. It's geekese to me. Can't get through at Mozilla site so I'll be content to wait a few days. I'm still depressed about Netscape. :(
     
  5. 2004/11/09
    James

    James Inactive

    Joined:
    2004/07/14
    Messages:
    1,004
    Likes Received:
    0
    It's okay. I finally figured it out. Thanks for the heads-up, Ramona.
     
  6. 2004/11/09
    Bmoore1129

    Bmoore1129 Geek Member

    Joined:
    2002/06/11
    Messages:
    1,675
    Likes Received:
    3
    I got the .zip file and installed it.

    Works good with no problems but then I never had any problems with any of the builds. I guess I don't put it through any weird uses so I probably wouldn't have any problems.

    I imported my cookies, passwords, and bookmarks with no problems. Also went to the spellbound site and installed the spell checker without a hitch.

    So far so good. :cool:
     
  7. 2004/11/09
    Westside

    Westside Inactive Alumni

    Joined:
    2003/03/30
    Messages:
    4,506
    Likes Received:
    14
    1.0PR2 had al the virtues which you asked for, except that bugs and gremlins can always show up. And 1.0 final has not taken any step back.
    But, if you are an extention fans, forget it. Even 1.0PR2 did not have the prefbar working.
     
  8. 2004/11/09
    Bmoore1129

    Bmoore1129 Geek Member

    Joined:
    2002/06/11
    Messages:
    1,675
    Likes Received:
    3
    Westside

    prefbar?

    Tools>Extensions now opens a window whereas it opened nothing in the PR's.
     
  9. 2004/11/09
    Ramona

    Ramona Geek Member Alumni Thread Starter

    Joined:
    2001/12/31
    Messages:
    7,481
    Likes Received:
    2
    Be sure to read the Firefox 1.0 Release Notes. They are full of information, including installation instructions. For users new to Firefox, it's always a good idea to go over these notes thoroughly to acquaint yourself with all features of the browser.

    After only a few hours use, it's impossible to comment on stability, but as 1.0 RC 2 was rock solid, I'm certain that 1.0 will not only be the same, but better.

    Ramona
     
  10. 2004/11/10
    Daddad

    Daddad Inactive

    Joined:
    2002/01/07
    Messages:
    210
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hello All, especially Ramona
    Thanks Ramona for letting all of us know of this final release of Firefox 1.0

    I got it yesterday and so far it is rock solid.

    It will go into a new machine build I am doing today.

    God love the Mozilla team, they really have something here.

    Daddad
     
  11. 2004/11/10
    shadowhawk

    shadowhawk Inactive

    Joined:
    2002/01/07
    Messages:
    985
    Likes Received:
    0
    There are extensions available. The updater doesn't work. You have to go to the sites to find them.
     
  12. 2004/11/10
    Ramona

    Ramona Geek Member Alumni Thread Starter

    Joined:
    2001/12/31
    Messages:
    7,481
    Likes Received:
    2
    Daddad,

    The owner of that PC you're building is in for a delightful experience! I couldn't be more pleased with this final release of Firefox. The wait was well worth it, and just imagine what Version 2.0 will be like?

    Ramona :D
     
  13. 2004/11/14
    liphor

    liphor Inactive

    Joined:
    2004/06/24
    Messages:
    42
    Likes Received:
    0
    Difference between firefox 1 and netscape 7.2

    What is the difference between Firefox 1 and Netscape 7.2. Which browser would be better?
     
  14. 2004/11/14
    fieldtech

    fieldtech Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    2002/02/20
    Messages:
    133
    Likes Received:
    0
    I've been using FireFox 1.0 Preview Release for some months now with no problems. Is this download a newer version?
     
  15. 2004/11/14
    Bmoore1129

    Bmoore1129 Geek Member

    Joined:
    2002/06/11
    Messages:
    1,675
    Likes Received:
    3
    Westside

    What is the "prefbar "?
     
  16. 2004/11/14
    Ramona

    Ramona Geek Member Alumni Thread Starter

    Joined:
    2001/12/31
    Messages:
    7,481
    Likes Received:
    2
  17. 2004/11/15
    JSS3rd Lifetime Subscription

    JSS3rd Geek Member

    Joined:
    2002/06/28
    Messages:
    2,221
    Likes Received:
    27
    Ramona ...

    Thanks for the info about the PrefBar. The only extension I've used in the past has been Tabbrowser Extensions, without which (for me, at least), Firefox is severely crippled, but I think the PrefBar will be a handy addition. I especially like the fact that it can be hidden and recalled with the F8 key.

    Shadowhawk ...

    I've been using Firefox 1.0 since its release (installing each new build daily), and have had no problems with the extension updater.


    liphor ...

    Ramona is the expert here, and I probably should defer to her, but this is my take on your question. I haven't used Netscape in over 18 months, so I can speak only about Netscape 6.x. It was a product suite, meaning that the program included a browser, an email client, and a newsreader, and I would think that the same is still true of 7.2. I was frustrated by the fact that it wasn't very configurable, and I didn't like the way it handled my email, so I switched to Mozilla, which I found more to my liking.

    At about that same time Phoenix (later named Firebird, and now Firefox) had reached a stage of maturity where it was worth trying. I liked it so much that I dumped both Netscape and Mozilla and have never looked back.

    Firefox is a stand-alone browser. Thunderbird (now at version .9+), which I've been using for just as long, is its stand-alone email counterpart. Both are rock-solid, very configurable and, despite the fact that they are separate programs, each can be opened from the other. Together, the two of them handle all my needs, as I have no need for a separate news-reader.

    Netscape is built on the same basic code (the "gecko engine ") as are Mozilla and Firefox but, as I understand it, eventually Firefox and Thunderbird will be the surviving products. So, give Firefox a try ... I think you'll like it.
     
  18. 2004/11/15
    Ramona

    Ramona Geek Member Alumni Thread Starter

    Joined:
    2001/12/31
    Messages:
    7,481
    Likes Received:
    2
    Jim,

    I think you did a fine job of answering liphor. I would add that Firefox isn't bogged down with any AOL components, no Instant Messaging, offers of free AOL Internet Service, Desktop icons, etc.

    Being a standalone browser, Firefox is very fast. If you have a broadband connection you will be amazed at its speed. It's also a personal preference. Do you prefer the suite, which contains Mail & Newsgroups, or would you prefer a standalone mail client, and standalone browser.

    The user interface (UI) is configurable on both applications, Toolbars are configurable, many extensions, themes, etc. I've only used Firefox and Thunderbird for about a month as my default browser and mail client, I am quite pleased with both. In fact, I now find it more convenient having the two separate applications.

    That's my story and I'm sticking to it! :D

    Ramona

    P.S. Do you still need the Tab extension with the new Version? I don't use the extension, but just from reading, it appears you can do all that within the UI.
     
  19. 2004/11/15
    Bmoore1129

    Bmoore1129 Geek Member

    Joined:
    2002/06/11
    Messages:
    1,675
    Likes Received:
    3
    Ramona

    Thanks for the prefbar link. I had never heard of it before.

    I also like the separated Browser and Mail program. I guess I'm a linear kinda guy. One thing at a time. I like the way I can dump the Browser with careless abandon and it doesn't bother my mail a bit. ;)
     
  20. 2004/11/15
    Ramona

    Ramona Geek Member Alumni Thread Starter

    Joined:
    2001/12/31
    Messages:
    7,481
    Likes Received:
    2
    Me too Bill, and vice versa. One of the issues in the older Netscape 7 versions, was that if you closed Netscape from the Mail window, you crashed fairly often.
    Doesn't happen in 7.2 however.

    The only extensions I have used are Chatzilla, for Mod meetings on another Forum, and Spellbound for spell checking text fields, i.e., BBS reply fields, etc. Glad that I posted the Preferences Toolbar, since you and Jim weren't aware of that one.

    Ramona
     
  21. 2004/11/15
    JSS3rd Lifetime Subscription

    JSS3rd Geek Member

    Joined:
    2002/06/28
    Messages:
    2,221
    Likes Received:
    27
    Truthfully, I don't know, but TBE has some features that I've become dependent on, such as having a "close" button on each tab and being able to force each link to open in a new tab, rather than having to select it from the link context menu.

    Because tabbed browsing has become second nature to me, it's frustrating that "Open Link in New Window" appears above "Open Link in New Tab" on the link context menu. So, for a long time I've been editing the "browser.xul" file in \Chrome\browser.jar so that the two lines are juxtaposed. Recently, because it's so seldom that I want to open anything in a new window, rather than a tab, I've begun removing the "Window" option entirely, from each new build. If I really need a new window, it's easy enough to open one from the menubar or keyboard.

    Tell you what ... I'll uninstall TBE, check out Firefox's native tab properties, and report back.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.