1. You are viewing our forum as a guest. For full access please Register. WindowsBBS.com is completely free, paid for by advertisers and donations.

Best way to upgrade video card...

Discussion in 'PC Hardware' started by fer_rios25, 2004/11/05.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. 2004/11/05
    fer_rios25

    fer_rios25 Inactive Thread Starter

    Joined:
    2004/10/24
    Messages:
    112
    Likes Received:
    0
    hello,

    What is the best cheapest way to upgrade my video card? Im talking 128 or 256 mb for less than $100?? Where should i buy it? :confused:
     
  2. 2004/11/05
    BillyBob Lifetime Subscription

    BillyBob Inactive

    Joined:
    2002/01/07
    Messages:
    6,048
    Likes Received:
    0
    I will not suggest an actual card because there are many good ones around now. I myself use Nvidia cards.

    But I can suggest how to install the new.

    Uninstall the old card drivers and set the Video back to standard VGA and restart the system at least once to be sure it stays there. This will be more certain of the old drivers not being used.

    Then shutdown ( power down ) remove the old card an install the new.

    DO NOT let Windows install ANY drivers other than standard VGA drivers during the reboot. Regardless of what MS would like to think Windows does not alwasy know best.

    Once you are sure the card is picked up by the system, restart the OS and then install the drivers for the new card after the machine is booted up.

    BillyBob
     

  3. to hide this advert.

  4. 2004/11/05
    Chiles4

    Chiles4 Inactive

    Joined:
    2002/01/09
    Messages:
    654
    Likes Received:
    1
    In that price range, you're talking about a 128MB video card. Assuming you're looking for a card to meet an "average" user's needs (no CAD/CAM or high-end apps), a very good card would be one using the ATI 9600 chipset. An even cheaper alternative would be one using the ATI 9200 chipset.

    A "9600" card would let you do some gaming aside from being a good all-around card. A "9200" would be more limited for gaming but again, another all around good card. I'm assuming you're using Windows XP.

    I can only recommend ATI cards as I gave up on Nvidia when they suffered from their "FX" cards debacle. They have straightened their act up since then but I'm only following their very high-end cards which are $400 and up.

    And if online shopping is cool with you, get the card at newegg.com . It's the best online vendor in the US - period.

    Gary
     
  5. 2004/11/05
    BillyBob Lifetime Subscription

    BillyBob Inactive

    Joined:
    2002/01/07
    Messages:
    6,048
    Likes Received:
    0
    when they suffered from their "FX" cards debacle.

    ??? I do have to ask.

    What is wrong with Nvidia ? I have two FX 5200 cards. One on 98SE and the other on XP Pro. I have had the best luck with them.

    We play MS Links LS 2003 Golf over the Internet. MY Wife and I play LAN games with no problems.

    I have had no problems AFTER I got the old drivers out and let the new ones in PROPERLY.

    I myself have found most ( or a least a lot of ) Video problems to be IMPROPER installation. Just pulling one out and putting the other in does not cut it.

    That is the reason for my suggestion earlier.

    BillyBob
     
  6. 2004/11/05
    fer_rios25

    fer_rios25 Inactive Thread Starter

    Joined:
    2004/10/24
    Messages:
    112
    Likes Received:
    0
    ok, best gaming card?

    Well, what i want to do i heavy gaming. Which would be the better option for the cheapest prize? Nvidia or ATI?
     
  7. 2004/11/05
    BillyBob Lifetime Subscription

    BillyBob Inactive

    Joined:
    2002/01/07
    Messages:
    6,048
    Likes Received:
    0
    It may not be the Video card alone that matters. It may well be which one works best In YOUR system,

    There is no part of the system that works alone.

    Apparently Chiles4 has had good luck with ATI. I have had better luck with Nvidia.

    Sometimes the MotherBoard & CPU combo play a part in things too.

    BillyBob
     
    Last edited: 2004/11/05
  8. 2004/11/05
    BillyBob Lifetime Subscription

    BillyBob Inactive

    Joined:
    2002/01/07
    Messages:
    6,048
    Likes Received:
    0
    I can 100% vouch for that too.

    NVidia was USELESS on my Asus MB with an Intel CPU. But ATI worked fine.

    Now on these MSI MBs with AMD Processors Nvidia works just fine.

    BillyBob
     
  9. 2004/11/06
    Aku

    Aku Inactive

    Joined:
    2004/09/23
    Messages:
    116
    Likes Received:
    0
    I can play Day of Defeat at full details with an Intel P3 933MHz processor, 256MB RAM, and a Radeon 7000 with 32 MB of VRAM. I can also play Unreal Gold, Battlefield 1942(@ Medium Video settings), and Halo. This system is like 3 or 4 years old, and the video card was bought second hand. It all depends on the overall system. If I put a brand new top of the line Nvidia or ATi card in it, it still wouldnt run games like Far Cry.
     
    Aku,
    #8
  10. 2004/11/07
    mattman

    mattman Inactive Alumni

    Joined:
    2002/06/10
    Messages:
    8,198
    Likes Received:
    63
    Hi,

    www.gamespot.com will have the system requirements of all the games you are thinking of using.

    I prefer a Radeon (ATI) card. ATI and nVidia are the big rivals, their cards will be at a similar price for each equivalent model.

    You should not need 256mb of memory. There are virtually no programs that will utilise more than 128mb.

    Matt
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.