1. You are viewing our forum as a guest. For full access please Register. WindowsBBS.com is completely free, paid for by advertisers and donations.

Several test installations of SP2 on the same hardware

Discussion in 'Windows XP' started by Christer, 2004/09/08.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. 2004/09/08
    Christer

    Christer Geek Member Staff Thread Starter

    Joined:
    2002/12/17
    Messages:
    6,585
    Likes Received:
    74
    Hello all!

    This topic may be a bit boring but in the light of other discussions, it may even be informative ...... :rolleyes: ...... some interesting conclusions can be drawn.

    I have used Ghost Images to roll back my system to an earlier state and have installed SP2 under different conditions. In all cases, is it the Operating System only. System Restore is disabled, Hibernation is disabled and the Pagefile has been excluded from the respective size of the installations.

    Here we go:

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Clean installation of original XPRTM

    Size = 1,029 MB

    No NtUninstall folder(s)
    No ServicePackFiles

    Net Size = 1,029 MB

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

    XPRTM + SP1a + Critical Updates

    Size = 1,285 MB including;

    NtUninstall folders = 44 MB (hotfixes only, I denied creating an uninstall folder for SP1a)
    ServicePackFiles = 270 MB

    Net Size = 971 MB

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

    XPRTM + SP1a + Critical Updates + SP2 (time elapsed ~12 minutes)

    Size = 1,805 MB including;

    NtUninstall folders = 44 MB (hotfixes only, "¦)
    NtUninstall folder = 244 MB (SP2)
    ServicePackFiles = 499 MB

    Net Size = 1,018 MB

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

    XPRTM + SP2 (time elapsed ~10½ minutes)

    Size = 1,659 MB including;

    NtUninstall folder = 193 MB (SP2)
    ServicePackFiles = 471 MB

    Net Size = 995 MB

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Clean installation of XPRTM with SP2 slipstreamed

    Size = 1,126 MB

    No NtUninstall folder(s)
    No ServicePackFiles

    Net Size = 1,126 MB

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The fact that it takes longer to install SP2 on top of a fully updated SP1a installation than on top of the original RTM installation, indicate that the SP2 installer, first uninstalls what it deems necessary and then starts all installations of SP2 from the same condition.
    The fact that the NtUninstall folder for the on top of SP1a installation is larger than the one for the on top of the original RTM installation, supports this.

    There have been discussions about the NtUninstall folders and I believe that the concensus is that they can be deleted when the update(s) have been verified to work OK.

    There have been discussions about the ServicePackFiles and someone said that "as long as the service pack is going to stay, they can be deleted " but I don't think that they have anyting to do with an Uninstall ...... :confused: ...... that's what the NtUninstall folder is about. I believe that the jury is still out on that one but the verdict leans towards that they can be deleted.

    It has been argued that the leanest installation is a clean installation, using the original CD with the SP slipstreamed but my simple calculations indicate differently.

    The Net Size of a fully updated XPRTM + SP1a is actually smaller than the Size of the original XPRTM installation.

    The Net Size of both "on top of" installations of SP2 is smaller than the Net Size of the clean installation of XPRTM with SP2 slipstreamed.

    Go figure ...... :eek: ......

    Christer

    Edited:

    I forgot to mention that SP2 was the full file network download and so was SP1a.
     
    Last edited: 2004/09/08
  2. 2004/09/10
    Christer

    Christer Geek Member Staff Thread Starter

    Joined:
    2002/12/17
    Messages:
    6,585
    Likes Received:
    74
    Okey, let me throw a flare into this topic:

    The Net Sizes, after deleting the ServicePackFiles and NtUninstall folders from the "on top of" installations are not the same. The Net Size difference is ~23 MB. Under my "almost laboratory conditions" they should be almost the same but ~23 MB may be within the limits of "almost ".

    The clean install, using a slipstreamed CD, is larger by 108-131 MB.

    What are the cleaned "on top of" installations lacking ...... :confused: ...... it must be something?

    Maybe it is not good advice to clean the "on top of" installatios by deleting the SPF's!

    Christer

    Edited:

    Or is it possible that there is "debris" in the slipstreamed CD?
     
    Last edited: 2004/09/10

  3. to hide this advert.

  4. 2004/09/11
    alboy

    alboy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    2002/01/09
    Messages:
    539
    Likes Received:
    4
    Why are my files so small

    When checking the amount of space the NtUninstall folders are taking on my drive it come to about 80mgs for approx 30 updates, why do other peoples files seem to be so much bigger ? i am running win XP home and have downloaded most updates
    Will this increase substantially if i install SP2 with the restore option ?
     
  5. 2004/09/11
    Christer

    Christer Geek Member Staff Thread Starter

    Joined:
    2002/12/17
    Messages:
    6,585
    Likes Received:
    74
    Hello alboy,
    thanks for Your interest!

    The NtUninstall folders on my SP1a installation, fully updated, is 44 MB (compressed from 65 MB, IIRC).

    One item that may vary is when the system was installed. At the time of my installation, "Update Rollup 1" had been released and installing that one superceeded the installation of 22 separate updates. I would guess that the NtUninstall folders of those 22 separate updates are larger than for the UR1.

    After installing SP1a, I have installed 29 Critical Updates, including UR1. Of those 29, 4 were superceeding a previous CU.

    I had 18 NtUninstall folders before installing SP2 but now there are 19.

    Christer
     
  6. 2004/09/11
    Christer

    Christer Geek Member Staff Thread Starter

    Joined:
    2002/12/17
    Messages:
    6,585
    Likes Received:
    74
    I forgot,

    There is no option to skip the SP2 uninstall files. If there was, I would have denied them (Ghost user).

    At the top of this thread, You will find which size of the NtUninstall folder You can expect.

    No guaranties, though. This is on my specific system, other systems will probably be slightly (?) different.

    Christer
     
  7. 2004/09/11
    alboy

    alboy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    2002/01/09
    Messages:
    539
    Likes Received:
    4
    There is no option to skip the SP2 uninstall files. If there was, I would have denied them (Ghost user).

    Hi Christer
    I also use Ghost but luckily i have not had to restore an image yet.
    I think that i will take a chance and install SP2 in a few months time when it has settled a bit as i am sure future updates will require SP2 to be installed.

    regards alboy
     
  8. 2004/09/11
    Christer

    Christer Geek Member Staff Thread Starter

    Joined:
    2002/12/17
    Messages:
    6,585
    Likes Received:
    74
    alboy,
    neither have I HAD TO restore an Image but on one occasion when ...... :rolleyes: ...... I tried System Restore. Ghost bailed me out ...... :cool: ...... !

    I have, however, restored an Image several times because I WANTED TO. The last week I probably restored ten times, using different Images, when I fooled around with SP2.

    Good luck, whenever You decide to do the deed!

    Christer

    By the way, I just came home from our flying club where we have an old computer in the briefing room, accessible to everyone. It's based on a PIII/500 and 384 MB PC100.
    Installing SP2 took 45 minutes and, unexpectedly, went flawlessly!
     
  9. 2004/09/11
    alboy

    alboy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    2002/01/09
    Messages:
    539
    Likes Received:
    4
    Ghost bailed me out

    Hi Christer
    I would be grateful for your experiences with Ghost as my only previous experience with imageing software is Drive Image v2 on a win 95 machine. It imaged okay but i would get an error when trying to restore( it trashed the MBR ) and the only thing that bailed me out then was Norton Utilities.
    Is it correct that Ghost has to reboot 3 times to restore an image ?
    regards
    alboy
     
  10. 2004/09/12
    Christer

    Christer Geek Member Staff Thread Starter

    Joined:
    2002/12/17
    Messages:
    6,585
    Likes Received:
    74
    alboy,

    Nope, when the restore is successfully completed, You are prompted to "reset the computer" or to "continue ". To "continue" would mean restoring another partition or creating another image but I would never take any chances. I always hit "reset the computer" and remove any bootable media (Floppy, CD or DVD) and it is no longer a Ghost operation.

    Ghost hits the reset button for You but Ghost itself doesn't reboot the computer, the BIOS does.

    Where did You hear/read that?

    Christer
     
  11. 2004/09/12
    alboy

    alboy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    2002/01/09
    Messages:
    539
    Likes Received:
    4
    Where did You hear/read that?

    Can't remember ,
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.