1. You are viewing our forum as a guest. For full access please Register. WindowsBBS.com is completely free, paid for by advertisers and donations.

Missing NTLDR and switched Drives

Discussion in 'Windows XP' started by roy66, 2004/08/07.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. 2004/08/07
    roy66

    roy66 Well-Known Member Thread Starter

    Joined:
    2002/03/07
    Messages:
    756
    Likes Received:
    3
    Hi there,

    I am running 2HD on Win XP.

    Computer management suggests that drive C is the System drive ? with 66% free.
    Drive D is the Boot drive with 31% free.

    My settings now prioritize D which wasn't always the case.
    Previously C was the main drive and D was the slave.

    Due to a missing NTLDR I did what I thought was an XP repair but it seems that I somehow managed to have the hard drive preference switch..if any of that makes sense......though it seems nothing is imaginable with PC's.

    Is ther some way I can get the HD lettering reversed..C to become D and D to become C.

    I went into Computer management to try and change the letters but it was a bit beyond me.

    HELP!
    Then there is also the matter of the missing NTLDR from the system/drive somewhere though not sure which one.
     
    Last edited: 2004/08/07
  2. 2004/08/07
    PeteC

    PeteC SuperGeek Staff

    Joined:
    2002/05/10
    Messages:
    28,896
    Likes Received:
    389
    Hi roy66

    I'd sure like to help out - even if it may be a case of the blind leading the blind :D

    I assume the computer is running? Exactly what did you do to restore the missing NTLDR? This article under Win XP users gives the procedure. Might be worth repeating?

    System drive should be the one with the OS installed - is this the case? See my computer Management window below.I don't see a Boot drive as such.

    Explain, please :confused:
    See How To Restore the System/Boot Drive Letter in Windows I would approach this with extreme caution - read the warning note
     

  3. to hide this advert.

  4. 2004/08/07
    roy66

    roy66 Well-Known Member Thread Starter

    Joined:
    2002/03/07
    Messages:
    756
    Likes Received:
    3
    PeteC,

    I tried the following before posting but the outcome was that "The system cannot find the file specified "
    Windows XP users

    Insert the Windows XP bootable CD into the computer.
    When prompted to press any key to boot from the CD, press any key.
    Once in the Windows XP setup menu press the "R" key to repair Windows.
    Log into your Windows installation by pressing the "1" key and pressing enter.
    You will then be prompted for your administrator password, enter that password.
    Copy the below two files to the root directory of the primary hard disk. In the below example we are copying these files from the CD-ROM drive letter "E ". This letter may be different on your computer.

    copy e:\i386\ntldr c:
    copy ntdetect.com c:

    I'm off to bed now 10:20pm. will follow through on this later on.

    Thanks.
     
  5. 2004/08/07
    PeteC

    PeteC SuperGeek Staff

    Joined:
    2002/05/10
    Messages:
    28,896
    Likes Received:
    389
    Try the direct route ....

    The i386 folder is also located in C:\Windows\ServicePackFiles\ and both the files are there - assuming that it is C drive which holds the OS.
     
  6. 2004/08/07
    bluzkat

    bluzkat Inactive

    Joined:
    2002/04/02
    Messages:
    626
    Likes Received:
    0
    When you ran your Windows repair, did you wind up with 2 installations of XP? Is there another set of Windows files located on your D: drive? I may be way off base here, but when you stated D: was your *boot* drive and C: was your *system* drive, that was the first thing that came to mind.

    B :cool:
     
  7. 2004/08/08
    roy66

    roy66 Well-Known Member Thread Starter

    Joined:
    2002/03/07
    Messages:
    756
    Likes Received:
    3
    Hi there folks, back again.

    I’ll try to give a bit of clarity so I won’t have you guessing too much.
    I have 2 Primary H/D
    One Master the 2nd Slave.
    The Master should be C and the slave D..that is how they have always operated.
    Both run on XP Home.
    A few days back I did a bit of a cleanup and obviously dumped something in the Recycle Bin
    that shouldn’t have gone there and it got emptied automatically on re-boot so I have now programmed it not to do that in future.

    Boot Master with Slave unplugged I get NTLDR is missing and the boot info readout does not recognise Master...only Slave. (strange)

    Boot Slave with Master unplugged I get "Windows could not start because of a computer disk hardware configuration problem. Could not read from the related boot disk. Check boot path and disk hardware
    The boot info readout does not recognise Slave only Master.(strange)

    Boot with both drives plugged in boots up OK and boot info recognises both drives.

    Went into BIOS to reconfigure the order of H/D but it made no difference and as they are set on auto I suppose the system just handles it.....however the boot Master and only Slave recognised
    and boot Slave and only Master recognised is a bit mysterious to me.

    I have noticed that any dowload now "automatically" wants to be installed on D whereas before C would be the drive it would load to.

    Just wondering if removing and replacing the CMOS battery might rattle its brain back into
    order??

    I have extracted i386 on to a floppy.
     
    Last edited: 2004/08/08
  8. 2004/08/08
    PeteC

    PeteC SuperGeek Staff

    Joined:
    2002/05/10
    Messages:
    28,896
    Likes Received:
    389
    roy66,

    Can we be absolutely clear that you have a single install of XP and that is on the Master drive which was C, bit is now D?

    How are the drives jumpered? If they are both on cable select I would try jumpering them to master and slave as appropriate.

    If the computer will boot Ntldr and ntdetect.com must exist on the drive containing the OS which should happily boot without the slave attached.

    It is almost as if the two drives are being seen as one by Windows.

    I doubt if clearing the CMOS would solve the problem, but you can always try.

    How? - it's of the order of 272 Mb.

    I'll come back with some more suggestions when I thought them over.
     
  9. 2004/08/08
    roy66

    roy66 Well-Known Member Thread Starter

    Joined:
    2002/03/07
    Messages:
    756
    Likes Received:
    3
    How does THIS sound?
     
  10. 2004/08/08
    PeteC

    PeteC SuperGeek Staff

    Joined:
    2002/05/10
    Messages:
    28,896
    Likes Received:
    389
    Reasonable enough - but the statement re. an Upgrade CD not being bootable is wrong, IMO. My upgrade CD boots well enough!

    I always hesitate to suggest the use of fixboot and fixmbr on the simple basis that I have never had cause to use these commands and thus no experience of them, but in this case they seem very appropriate.

    How about a bit of feedback on the questions posted earlier?
     
  11. 2004/08/08
    roy66

    roy66 Well-Known Member Thread Starter

    Joined:
    2002/03/07
    Messages:
    756
    Likes Received:
    3
    Sorry Pete..this is the best I can do.

    Hi there folks, back again.

    I’ll try to give a bit of clarity so I won’t have you guessing too much.
    I have 2 Primary H/D
    One Master the 2nd Slave.
    The Master should be C and the slave D..that is how they have always operated.
    Both run on XP Home.
    A few days back I did a bit of a cleanup and obviously dumped something in the Recycle Bin
    that shouldn’t have gone there and it got emptied automatically on re-boot so I have now programmed it not to do that in future.

    Boot Master with Slave unplugged I get NTLDR is missing and the boot info readout does not recognise Master...only Slave. (strange)

    Boot Slave with Master unplugged I get "Windows could not start because of a computer disk hardware configuration problem. Could not read from the related boot disk. Check boot path and disk hardware
    The boot info readout does not recognise Slave only Master.(strange)

    Boot with both drives plugged in boots up OK and boot info recognises both drives.

    Went into BIOS to reconfigure the order of H/D but it made no difference and as they are set on auto I suppose the system just handles it.....however the boot Master and only Slave recognised
    and boot Slave and only Master recognised is a bit mysterious to me.

    I have noticed that any dowload now "automatically" wants to be installed on D whereas before C would be the drive it would load to.

    Just wondering if removing and replacing the CMOS battery might rattle its brain back into
    order??

    Did the battery bit...no change..reset.
     
  12. 2004/08/08
    PeteC

    PeteC SuperGeek Staff

    Joined:
    2002/05/10
    Messages:
    28,896
    Likes Received:
    389
    roy66

    I am trying to help, but it is difficult if you are unable to clarify a point or two ....

    i.e. a single Windows folder - no Windows folder on the other drive?

    If you have been unplugging/plugging drives surely you can give me this info?

    Can you please explain exactly what you mean by this as the i386 folder is some 272 Mb - a floppy 1.44 Mb?

    I will try and get some more views on your problem and maybe a straight forward solution.
     
  13. 2004/08/08
    roy66

    roy66 Well-Known Member Thread Starter

    Joined:
    2002/03/07
    Messages:
    756
    Likes Received:
    3
    Sorry Pete...I know you are trying to help and I really appreciate that.

    I am no tech nerd, I am an uneducated, self taught 68 year old and at times have difficulty with the jargon and abreviations.

    Thanks for your patience and the manner in which you presented your last post.

    C and D both have a WINDOWS folder.

    Drives are jumpered...Cable select

    i386...seems I don't have it on floppy then.....what I did was to do a search of i386 on C and D and just copied one of those to the floppy. as it fitted it seems it isn't what we are after.
     
  14. 2004/08/08
    PeteC

    PeteC SuperGeek Staff

    Joined:
    2002/05/10
    Messages:
    28,896
    Likes Received:
    389
    Excellent - I now have an insight into what may have happened and some suggestions for a way forward.

    This is my analysis of the problem ....

    Something went awry when you attempted to repair XP and you inadvertently installed another copy - to the other hard drive.

    As you are using cable select the whole system is confused, but would appear to be booting from the new install.

    I suggest you set the jumpers to Master on the original C drive and Slave on the original D drive and leave the slave drive disconnected for the time being.

    Attempt to boot - if you get the NTLDR missing message follow this procedure again, bearing in mind that your CD ROM drive should be D: with the slave drive disconnected.

    Post back with your results - good or bad.

    I have 'called in the Cavalry' - no doubt they will be along as the USA wakes up :D

    BTW I too am self taught - started 15 years ago with an IBM x286 with a massive 20 Mb hard drive and 2 Mb RAM!
     
  15. 2004/08/08
    roy66

    roy66 Well-Known Member Thread Starter

    Joined:
    2002/03/07
    Messages:
    756
    Likes Received:
    3
    Thanks Pete,

    2300hours here and I'm off to bed, will follow your instructions in the morning......Monday9th.

    nighty nite.

    roy
    THANKS
     
  16. 2004/08/08
    PeteC

    PeteC SuperGeek Staff

    Joined:
    2002/05/10
    Messages:
    28,896
    Likes Received:
    389
    OK, sleep well, but check here before you do anything Monday morning.
     
  17. 2004/08/08
    BillyBob Lifetime Subscription

    BillyBob Inactive

    Joined:
    2002/01/07
    Messages:
    6,048
    Likes Received:
    0
    Some readers may get a surprise to see FORMAT in my suggestions.

    But, I would go along with PeteC except that it may only cause probelms later. I think the Drive that is now D: should be formated, Jumpers changed as was suggested and left in place along with the CDROM. Otherwise there may well be problems with the CDROM ( and any software tha may be installed ) especially when the 2nd HD is reinstalled.

    But in any case the Windows setup on D: will somehow need to be illiminated.

    BillyBob
     
    Last edited: 2004/08/08
  18. 2004/08/08
    Rockster2U

    Rockster2U Geek Member

    Joined:
    2002/04/01
    Messages:
    3,181
    Likes Received:
    9
    Kind of in agreement.

    (Roy66 - suggestion - slow down and listen to whats being said instead of trying continued "shotgun" approach, hoping something finds its target and fixes your problem. In other words, be cautious, calculating and methodical - one step at a time.)

    First, lets rehash - took quite some time, but Pete's initial suspicions were confirmed re: 2 installations. I also believe Pete's "fix" re; pasting those two files to the root directory should work. Think we're all in agreement that second hard drive (the current D which appears to be bootable) should be temporarily disabled before attempting the fix. And, as referenced - this could become a problem when it is re-enabled or thrown back into the mix.

    I don't agree with master/slave jumpering because cable select should be just fine and will circumvent the need for multiple jumper setting changes. Think about it - master with no slave, master with slave and slave - may also require removing drives to access jumpers depending on Roy's drives, skill set, knowledge and tools. Cable select will work fine - just keep C on the last header, whether D is plugged in or not. And, its not going to impact the OS or BIOS re: seeing that C should be master.

    So where are we under CS jumpering scenario and whats next? As mentioned in earlier posts - disable D and run the fix as outlined after booting to XP CD. Then try booting with D still disabled. If successful, you're halfway home. Now reconnect D and try booting. If successful in booting to C with D attached, then copy what you need from D to C and as BB suggested, wipe D and re-format (you can even do a quick format if so desired). If not successful, you can run FIXBOOT from the CD after rebooting once again from the CD. Alternately, you can boot from a 98 start disk and FDISK D (second drive), deleting the partiton and building a new one. (note - this also trashes all data on D). Another alternative is to use something like Partition Magic to deactivate D if its causing a boot problem when both drives are present. Regardless, longer term you want to get that second XP installation out of your system.

    Good Luck Young Man ..........

    ;)
     
  19. 2004/08/08
    PeteC

    PeteC SuperGeek Staff

    Joined:
    2002/05/10
    Messages:
    28,896
    Likes Received:
    389
    Rockster2U

    My thoughts on jumpering as master and slave were based on persuading the original master drive which now thinks it is a slave that it is really master, but I guess cable select with that drive on the end of the cable will serve the same purpose.
     
  20. 2004/08/08
    BillyBob Lifetime Subscription

    BillyBob Inactive

    Joined:
    2002/01/07
    Messages:
    6,048
    Likes Received:
    0
    I agree with pretty much everything that has been posted EXCEPT Removing the 2nd drive before the repair install.

    I am looking more at the future than the present.

    In order to get Windows back to the C: drive properly the one on D: will need to be removed anyway. And seing as now it does contain a Windows folder plugging it in later MAY CAUSE BIG proplems unless it is formated ( or otherwise cleaned up ) first. And with XP just deleting the Windows folder MAY NOT be enough.

    FORMAT the D: drive and leave it in place. Re-install XP to the C: drive and I believe you will have a much more reliable and easier to handle system.

    Any existing programs on D: will most likely need to be reinstalled anyway to make them more solid and reliable also as they may well be looking for Windows to be on D:.

    Question.

    Does the 2nd HD have more than one Partition on it ? If by chance it does then it will mess things up even more by plugging it in later.

    BillyBob
     
  21. 2004/08/08
    PeteC

    PeteC SuperGeek Staff

    Joined:
    2002/05/10
    Messages:
    28,896
    Likes Received:
    389
    Seems to me that referencing the drive letters willy nilly is very confusing.

    We have to remember that the drive letters have apparently switched, so when drive C: is referred to - which one ? current or original.

    Thus when a reformat of D: is spoken of this must refer to the original D: and not the current D: which is the original C: that we are trying to restore.

    Does this make any sense?

    Hopefully we can reach a consensus before Roy66 is likely to log on again, which I would estimate to be ....

    9 am Queensland, Australia (Monday)
    10 pm BST (Sunday) UK
    5 pm Eastern (Sunday) USA
    2 pm Pacific (Sunday) USA
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.