1. You are viewing our forum as a guest. For full access please Register. WindowsBBS.com is completely free, paid for by advertisers and donations.

Post for Digital Camera Owners

Discussion in 'PC Hardware' started by MinnesotaMike, 2003/12/28.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. 2003/12/28
    MinnesotaMike

    MinnesotaMike Geek Member Thread Starter

    Joined:
    2002/01/07
    Messages:
    1,396
    Likes Received:
    3
    I'm in the market for a digital camera. I'm looking for at least 3.0 megapixils, something that has decent zoom capabilities, and takes good pictures. I know I can go to all the review places and read till I'm blue in the face, but I would like personal recommendations.

    If you have a digital camera, I would like to hear what camera you have and your likes and dislikes of that camera. I want to hear the good and bad. Hopefully, more good than bad! :D Any helpful tips that you've learned would also be nice. I've searched through some of the posts here and see that a card reader is mentioned. I assume that is something to look at.

    Thanks and happy New Year!

    Mike
     
  2. 2003/12/28
    JohnB Lifetime Subscription

    JohnB Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    2002/01/07
    Messages:
    856
    Likes Received:
    11
    Hi Mike: I have a Kodak DX3700, 3.1 MegaPixel, digital zoom, Easyshare Dock.

    Pro's: Very easy to use most funtions are automatic; very easy to upload pics to computer over USB port using Kodaks software that comes with camera and dock. Is a basic digital camera with nothing fancy. Takes fairly good pictures in good light, has 3 image quality settings, good (e-mail), better (snapshots) and best (enlargements). Has 8 MB internal memory and capability to add flash cards for more memory. Price about $300 CDN I think. Software that comes with camera has lots of gimicks, options if you want them.

    Cons: Rechargable battery is the pitts. Doesn't keep charge unless left on the charger dock, so have to carry a non-rechargeable batt. as a backup. Need good light for pic's unless using flash. Can be difficult to centre picture on closeups and zoom shots as lens is to one side of camera and viewfinder is centred. Hard to see lcd screen in bright light.

    I like the camera for it's ease of use, but the battery thing is frustrating. Also the offsett lens can cause you to miss some shots or at least get them off centre.

    Recommendations: If you have the bucks to spend I would go with something like the Cannon Eos Rebel Digital or the Nikkon equivalent. Both have interchangable lenses (you can use lenses from existing film type Cannons and Nikkons if you have one) optical and digital zoom. Pricey at around $1200 CDN but probably worth it in the long run. Also being a full size camera are larger than many of the more compact digital cameras.
     
    Last edited: 2003/12/28

  3. to hide this advert.

  4. 2003/12/28
    MinnesotaMike

    MinnesotaMike Geek Member Thread Starter

    Joined:
    2002/01/07
    Messages:
    1,396
    Likes Received:
    3
    Thanks for all the info John, just what I was looking for from owners! Not sure I want to spend that much yet. I was looking at the Canon cameras though. The A80 and A70 don't look too bad. I would like to stay around $400 right now.

    Mike
     
  5. 2003/12/28
    kiwicolin

    kiwicolin Inactive

    Joined:
    2003/07/04
    Messages:
    49
    Likes Received:
    0
    One hint though is that optical zoom is preferable to digital zoom. Digital zoom is basically taking the image and enlarging it to give the effect of zooming with an increase in graininess etc, whereas optical is a true zoom. So the more optical the better.

    As to brand it is not so clear cut as it was with 35mm film cameras with the usual brands Pentax, Canon etc etc. They still produce fine digital cameras just like they do with film however the large film manufacturers eg Kodak, Fuji etc also produce excellent digital cameras usually at a more budget friendly price. Fuji in particular have a fine range but so do the others. It comes down, like often, to budget and requirements.
     
  6. 2003/12/28
    Welshjim

    Welshjim Inactive

    Joined:
    2002/01/07
    Messages:
    5,643
    Likes Received:
    0
    MinnesotaMike--Info on digital cameras is available at many websites. One of the best is
    http://www.dpreview.com/ (see the left column for many options including comparisons)
    And then there are all the referral sites, some of which offer opinions
    http://www.epinions.com/
    www.pricegrabber.com etc.
    Consumer Reports November 2003 issue rated digital cameras. Your local library should have it.
    For a few more days you should be able to access the ratings, but not all the prose at
    http://www.consumerreports.org/main/home.jsp
    Near the bottom right is a box "CRXtra ". Enter code 1106. For a little more enter code 1205b the next time around.
    This is really a do-it-yourself job once you satisfy yourself about the quality of a product. Other people cannot really tell you what camera is best for you, since they do not know what type of photography you are interested in.
    Buy a spare memory card when you do buy.
    And concerning a "card reader ", many cameras permit direct link to the PC so you do not need a separate reader.
     
  7. 2003/12/28
    MinnesotaMike

    MinnesotaMike Geek Member Thread Starter

    Joined:
    2002/01/07
    Messages:
    1,396
    Likes Received:
    3
    kiwicolin,

    Thanks for the tip on optical zoom. I'll take a look at the brands you mention.


    Welshjim,

    Thanks for the links and codes. I wasn't looking for somebody to tell me what camera to get. I was just looking for their likes and dislikes with the camera they have. Just trying to get a feel of what brands are good and which ones are not. I just need one for basic photography.

    Mike
     
  8. 2003/12/29
    Scott Smith

    Scott Smith Inactive Alumni

    Joined:
    2002/01/12
    Messages:
    1,950
    Likes Received:
    4
    I have a Nikon Cool Pix 5700 5 mega pixle camera.
    I have taken some awsome pictures with it as it has 8x optical zoom and then a ***** on 32x telephoto.

    Problem is it has too many bells and whistles for an amature like me. The smallest picture it will take is still a whopping 1/2 meg in size. (actually 2560 x 1920)
     
  9. 2003/12/29
    irdreed

    irdreed Inactive

    Joined:
    2002/09/27
    Messages:
    541
    Likes Received:
    0
    MinnesotaMike, I've got a little cheapie(?) HP-C200, that I mostly use for posting Web Site Pictures. I've been using it for at least 3yrs. or so. Advantages I feel for the digitals are you can download and print Now, as opposed to the Film type of camera. Disadvantages are the innards are not up to snuff compared to the Film cameras, I guess primarily the lense with respect to the 'capture" of a scene speed, or something like that. (That's why I didn't spend the big bucks) Outdoors, picture Quality is great, but inside with the built in Flash, that leaves a little bit to be desired. Just recently, I've seen inside shots with the High dollar digitals and they were only a little better than mine. Point is Digitals still have a long way to go to match Good Film Cameras. (By the way my 35MM is a Minolta Maxxum 3xi, with 50 mm lense and a 80-200 Zoom lense) I'm very well satisfied with my little C200 because I can still edit the Pix in my Photo Editor (Paint Shop Pro) and make it look just like it was taken with the expensive Digital or a good Film Camera.
    So if I may suggest, for whatever it's worth, is get whatever you can afford, and enjoy.:cool:

    Here is a place to view some of my work, some digital pix and some 35mm Film pix:

    http://www.eyeballexpress.com/
     
  10. 2003/12/29
    TonyT

    TonyT SuperGeek Staff

    Joined:
    2002/01/18
    Messages:
    9,072
    Likes Received:
    400
    I( researched digital cams for a few yrs now. I actuall had a Kodak in 1999 and returned at. It was an xmas gift. At that time, it could take 11 quality shots at higest resolution, I believe it was 2.5 megapixels. And a 32 MB xtra card cost abot 150 bucks, so I returned it and bought a scanner instead.

    Recently, I began my search again. What I really want is a Leica, a real Leica, but I do not want to spend several thousand bucks.

    Yesterday I bought the Kodak CX4530. It's 5.0 megapixels with built in 32 MB onternal memory and I also grabbed a stick in card with 128 MB memory. More than enough, that's over a hudred highest quality images at one time.

    The reasons I got the Kodak over others I looked at (and I looked at em all) are as follows:
    1. cost = $299.00
    2. docking station/recharger does not come with it but it's not needed either. The camera will use 2 doubleA rechargable batteries. (won't use regular alkaline batteries though). So I bought a battery charger with batteries for about 20 bucks. The dock station is a hundred bucks so I saved 80.
    3. 5 megapixels is a good qualityb image and if printing on 4x5 or 5x7 paper you cannpot tell the difference between that and a 11 megapixel camers on same size paper.
    4. Most important reason: I looked at probably 50 different cameras at many stores and this Kodak is the easiest to use of em all. After examining it, in less than 2 minutes I could takes pics, set preferences and adjust settings, review and delete images etc etc. It's VERY user friendly.
    5. It has a 3x optical zoom and a 3x digital zoom. ThreeX zoom is plenty for what I want the camera for, I am not doing race track shots or sporting events so no need for large zoom.
    6. You can install ONLY the needed drivers to use the camera when connected to your computer via usb and it's not necessary to install other cheapo graphics programs and promo software.
    7. It feels like a real camera, not like a lightweight 3 inch mold of chips and technology.

    All in all I got a great deal and am very happy with it so far.

    If you want the best consumer quality camera on the market currently (non-professional) then get the new Canon Rebel. My sister just got one and it's pretty cool. It has built in features for controlling color bias and layers and a lot of other stuff, but to use it you should have a good grasp of 35mm film processing and enlarging, as well as basic training in photography. It's actually a Pro camera priced for consumers, lot's of bells & whistles etc.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.