1. You are viewing our forum as a guest. For full access please Register. WindowsBBS.com is completely free, paid for by advertisers and donations.

500 gigs of trouble

Discussion in 'Windows XP' started by Jeffrey Parraga, 2009/12/08.

  1. 2009/12/08
    Jeffrey Parraga

    Jeffrey Parraga Inactive Thread Starter

    Joined:
    2009/12/07
    Messages:
    2
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hey everybody I have a 500GB SATA drive I am trying to load xp on. I installed the drive on SATA 4 so I could partition it 100gb on par 1 and the rest on par 2 cuz I know xp has a hard time with that big a drive without sp1,2,or 3. I used Partition Master by EASEUS, Which I have had real good luck with in the past. My BIOS sees the whole 500 so I know thats not it. But, I still get the blue screen of death,(shut down or be damned) when I boot from the XP install cd. Any help with this will earn my eternal gratitued.
     
  2. 2009/12/08
    Christer

    Christer Geek Member Staff

    Joined:
    2002/12/17
    Messages:
    6,585
    Likes Received:
    74
    Hello Jeffrey,
    welcome to Windows BBS ... :) ... !

    Follow the guide in Slipstreaming Windows XP Service Pack 3 and Create Bootable CD to overcome the size barrier in the original release of Windows XP. It should make it possible to use the HDD in a single partition.

    I have never used "Partition Master by EASEUS" but if it can remove all partitions on the HDD prior to booting from the fresh XP SP3 CD, I would opt for that and let the install CD do the partitioning and formatting.
     

  3. to hide this advert.

  4. 2009/12/08
    mattman

    mattman Inactive Alumni

    Joined:
    2002/06/10
    Messages:
    8,198
    Likes Received:
    63
    The original (pre-Service Pack) version didn't have SATA controller drivers, you needed to load the drivers from a floppy disk. Slipstream SP3 as suggested.
     
  5. 2009/12/11
    jparnold

    jparnold Inactive

    Joined:
    2005/09/08
    Messages:
    345
    Likes Received:
    1
    I read this post with a lot of interest as I recently built a new PC which as a 500GB SATA HDD.
    I decided to partition the HDD to imitate the way my previous PC was (it had 2 HDDs each 160GB and the first partitioned into 2 logical drives and the second into 3 logical drives)

    Quite by accident I created the first partition at 87GB - I didn't realise that xp has a hard time with that big a drive without sp1,2,or 3 (as Jeffrey states) although I have SP2, 2 and 3 installed.

    HOWEVER are there any know problems with HDD/s or partitions over a particular size with other applications? If so how do you get around the restriction of not being able to have more than 4 partitions on a HDD?
     
  6. 2009/12/12
    Christer

    Christer Geek Member Staff

    Joined:
    2002/12/17
    Messages:
    6,585
    Likes Received:
    74
    Not more than 4 PRIMARY partitions. Create one primary for the operating system and one extended which can be split into any number of logical drives.
     
  7. 2009/12/12
    Jeffrey Parraga

    Jeffrey Parraga Inactive Thread Starter

    Joined:
    2009/12/07
    Messages:
    2
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hey guys Thanks for the help ,but I only have the lone XP disc no sp @ all therefor no slipstream. The reason I was trying this was I went and got the upgrade to 7 and the drive so I could well, upgrade, and that in itself is the problem. Guess i'll just use the 500 for data. Again thanks for the help. Jeffrey
     
  8. 2009/12/12
    jparnold

    jparnold Inactive

    Joined:
    2005/09/08
    Messages:
    345
    Likes Received:
    1
    Thanks Christer
    Do primary and extended (logical) drives behave any differently eg is the read/write rates the same or are there any disadvantages using either?
    I now have my HDD partitioned into 4 primary drives even though I don't intend to (at this time) using multiple operating systems therefore could use extended logical drives).
    Also is it a bad idea to have a mix of primary and extended logical drives eg. Partition C: primary, partition D: primary, partition E: extended, partition F: extended.
    I just want to get my head around (and also learn) the pros and cons of using each type.
    Thanks
     
  9. 2009/12/13
    mattman

    mattman Inactive Alumni

    Joined:
    2002/06/10
    Messages:
    8,198
    Likes Received:
    63
    That is the point of Christer's link, slip-streaming the Service Pack 3 onto the original version of XP, so that it is then an SP3 Windows XP disk. If you have any computer knowledgeable friends or family, ask them if they have done it before and if they could help you, it's not very hard.

    Matt
     
  10. 2009/12/13
    Christer

    Christer Geek Member Staff

    Joined:
    2002/12/17
    Messages:
    6,585
    Likes Received:
    74
    I don't think that there's a performance reduction on a logical drive within an extended partition.

    I have one HDD with a primary partition (operating system) and an extended with a single logical (user data) indicating that it's OK to mix. I have another HDD with an extended partition split into two logicals (backup and ghost).

    I assume that's a typo and you mean that E: and F: are logicals within the same extended partition. I don't think you can have more than one extended partition on each HDD.
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.