1. You are viewing our forum as a guest. For full access please Register. WindowsBBS.com is completely free, paid for by advertisers and donations.

NETBIOS packets leaking through XP Pro with 2 NICs

Discussion in 'Networking (Hardware & Software)' started by bmxrh, 2008/05/21.

  1. 2008/05/21
    bmxrh

    bmxrh Inactive Thread Starter

    Joined:
    2008/05/21
    Messages:
    2
    Likes Received:
    0
    We have a set-up with 2 computers and a router:
    - computer 1, W2k, 1 NIC, IP 192.168.100.2
    - computer 2, XP Pro SP2, with NIC 1 192.168.100.3 and NIC 2 192.168.10.2
    - router, LAN-side IP 192.168.10.1
    All netmasks set to 255.255.255.0

    Computer 1 is connected to NIC 1 of computer 2.
    The router is connected to NIC 2 of computer 2.

    Computer 1 is sharing a folder, it should only be accessible from 192.168.100.*.
    Computer 2 is sharing a folder, it should only be accessible from 192.168.10.*, by means of port forwarding on the router.

    After having seen problems with an application on computer 1, we connected a network sniffer and saw that NETBIOS packages from computer 1 reach
    the router and the router sends a reply, which in turn also reaches computer 1. This seems to confuse the application I mentioned before.

    We were expecting that in this setup the 2 networks would be separated and
    that no NETBIOS packages would go from computer 1 to the router. Apparently we are wrong. We are hoping to find a solution that only requires a modified set-up of the Windows XP Pro (computer 2) machine.

    Any clues?

    Thanks,
    Rob
     
  2. 2008/05/21
    ReggieB

    ReggieB Inactive Alumni

    Joined:
    2004/05/12
    Messages:
    2,786
    Likes Received:
    2
    1. Go into the the properties of connection for NIC 2 on computer 2 (the one on the 192.168.10.0 subnet).
    2. Highlight TCP/IP and select properties.
    3. Click on the Advanced button
    4. Go to the WINS tab and select Disable NetBIOS over TCP/IP "
    5. Click OK to accept changes and close the window.

    That looks like a security hole to me. I hope you've taken measures to secure that connection. A VPN would be a better remote option to port forwarding. The connection should be authenticated and encrypted with a VPN connection but would not be with port forwarding.
     

  3. to hide this advert.

  4. 2008/05/21
    bmxrh

    bmxrh Inactive Thread Starter

    Joined:
    2008/05/21
    Messages:
    2
    Likes Received:
    0
    You are of course right that this is a security hole. However, the routers
    firewall is configured to only allow access by a specific computer in the
    more-or-less trusted WAN environment.

     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.