Windows BBS The Place for Microsoft Windows Support! Windows, Support, Help Site

Go Back   Windows BBS > Operating Systems > Windows 95/98/Me/NT

Windows 95/98/Me/NT Post your Windows 95 / 98 / ME and NT questions here. Please make sure you specify your OS version.

Register your FREE account to unlock additional features at WindowsBBS.com
Register
Welcome to WindowsBBS.com
Microsoft Windows Support

Mission Statement

WindowsBBS is an online community dedicated to easily accessible technical support for those using Microsoft operating systems and other Windows software.

Our goal is to become the leading resource for computer users that require assistance with their day-to-day computer usage, including full support for networking PC's, virus & malware removal, system upgrades and general support questions.


Discussion Forums
Operating Systems
Windows 7 Windows 7
Windows Vista Windows Vista
Windows XP Windows XP
Windows Server System Windows Server System
Windows 2000 Windows 2000
Windows 95/98/Me/NT Windows 95/98/Me/NT
Internet & Networking
Networking
Internet Explorer
Microsoft Mail
Firefox, Thunderbird
      & SeaMonkey

General Internet
Security
General Security
Malware and Virus
     Removal

Other
Other Software
Hardware
Test Posts
Community
Introductions
General Discussions
Comments
      & Suggestions

News @ WindowsBBS

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 12th November 2003   #1
Inactive
 
Profile:
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Albuquerque, NM, USA
Posts: 5,747
Computer Experience:
still learning
Welshjim Reputation Level


Windows Update--The End???

As of yesterday, when I try to use Windows Update, everything goes normally until I am told the scan is "100% complete". But then I am offered nothing. No Critical, no Recommended, no other downloads (like language plug-ins), no drivers.
I can understand I may not have any Critical Updates, but what happened to all the other stuff?
Have Windows98 users been cut off prematurely? MS Life Cycle page says we should get up-to-date online assistance until mid-January 2004. And my understanding was that all old fixes and plug-ins would remain available indefinitely.
Do others have the same problem?

P.S. This has been mentioned in one other thread
IE4 upgrade to IE6; ?via IE5.x?
but it is really not worth reading the thread just to find the reference. At least I am not alone.

Welshjim is offline  
Didn't find the information you thought to find?
Check out these Similar Threads
Old 12th November 2003   #2
Staff
 
PeteC's Avatar
 
Profile:
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Staffordshire, UK
Posts: 17,837
Computer Experience:
Usually not enough
PeteC Reputation LevelPeteC Reputation LevelPeteC Reputation LevelPeteC Reputation LevelPeteC Reputation LevelPeteC Reputation LevelPeteC Reputation LevelPeteC Reputation LevelPeteC Reputation LevelPeteC Reputation LevelPeteC Reputation Level

My System

Jim - they are still here but I guess you would expect that - last one dated Nov 6th 2003.

Edit

Just fired up my standby m/c - stacks of updates offered for Win 98SE by Windows Update. Either a temporary problem at MS end - or at yours?

PeteC is offline  
Old 12th November 2003   #3
Inactive
Lifetime Subscription
 
Profile:
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Marlboro, NY.
Posts: 6,211
Computer Experience:
Gaining more every d
BillyBob Reputation LevelBillyBob Reputation LevelBillyBob Reputation LevelBillyBob Reputation LevelBillyBob Reputation LevelBillyBob Reputation Level


Could the version of 98 be in any way involved here ?

I have 98SE and checked the updates and there are no critical but there are 42 others. Two for Media Player ( rest are mostly language related ) and one Audio Driver update.

BillyBob


Last edited by BillyBob; 12th November 2003 at 22:34.
BillyBob is offline  
Old 12th November 2003   #4
Senior Member
 
Profile:
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 73
Computer Experience:
beginner
neil Reputation Level


I read Arie's post about critical updates in cluding W98, and went to updates with same results. No critical, or any other available.
I have w98 also.
neil

neil is offline  
Old 12th November 2003   #5
Inactive
Lifetime Subscription
 
Profile:
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Marlboro, NY.
Posts: 6,211
Computer Experience:
Gaining more every d
BillyBob Reputation LevelBillyBob Reputation LevelBillyBob Reputation LevelBillyBob Reputation LevelBillyBob Reputation LevelBillyBob Reputation Level


I just checked with the 2nd 98SE machine and had the same results as my previous reply.

BillyBob


Last edited by BillyBob; 13th November 2003 at 00:01.
BillyBob is offline  
Old 13th November 2003   #6
Geek Member
 
Profile:
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Peterborough, UK
Posts: 807
Computer Experience:
SC/MP
Hugh Jarss Reputation Level


Welshjim,
still having the same results (the other thread mentioned in Jim's first post), so I had a look at the Windows Update log file. 'Tis only a text file and they mention its use for debug purposes, so it didn't seem too much like reverse engineering

there is an internet address of an active server page which the update process uses to get a "manifest" (actually two pages, one's for the critical and windows bits, the other is for the drivers)

so I tried and found it would answer me with a very blank looking manifest. Not completely blank, had column "titles" - but nothing in the columns underneath.

OK I might not have been giving it the correct form of request, but the point is I didn't get the "brushoff" or even a 404 error. The page is still there and answering.

tried going up to the parent folder; there I did get rejected.

**edit: not really sure what to make of this, will watch and listen to peoples' views**

best wishes, HJ


Last edited by Hugh Jarss; 13th November 2003 at 12:12.
Hugh Jarss is offline  
Old 13th November 2003   #7
Inactive
 
Profile:
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: London, England
Posts: 267
Computer Experience:
Intermediate
gammaepsilon Reputation Level


Jim

I gave up on MS about 18 months ago when I had dial-up and most of the time the traffic was so heavy twix the UK and MS I hardly ever got a look in.

Since then I've been using BigFix and got three critical updates a few days ago: One for IE, one for OE and one for WSH.

BigFix Consumer

dr

gammaepsilon is offline  
Old 13th November 2003   #8
Geek Member
 
Profile:
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Peterborough, UK
Posts: 807
Computer Experience:
SC/MP
Hugh Jarss Reputation Level


Hi
Newt recommended the BigFix thing to me a couple of days ago and yes, indeed it seems the way to go.
It's the end of Windows Update for me, though, no matter what they do. While trying to find out what's going on I discovered that it's none too careful about where it puts its temporary files.
I've had them land on F:, G:, K:, just for starters (can see this from the log files on my backups).
Now: I installed Windows onto C: and have checked the environment etc., can confirm the following:

TMP=C:\WINDOWS\TEMP
TEMP=C:\WINDOWS\TEMP
winbootdir=C:\WINDOWS
PATH=C:\WINDOWS;C:\WINDOWS\COMMAND
COMSPEC=C:\WINDOWS\COMMAND.COM
windir=C:\WINDOWS

and can see nothing here to make me anticipate that Windows Update will suddenly start to using F:\WUTemp all by itself - but this is an example of what occurs. If the pesky thing crashes it doesn't even clear up the relics...

I have the OS on C: and wish to keep the other partitions as "user data", thankyou; I don't really want any access made to them - particularly when it doesn't warn me first. OK, perhaps I'm being a bit precious about it? But things can get confusing enough as it is, without these seemingly random incursions into odd locations. There's plenty enough room on C:, why can't it just stay on its "own territory"...

another reason for using this BigFix approach...

best wishes, HJ.

Hugh Jarss is offline  
Old 13th November 2003   #9
Inactive
 
Profile:
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,111
Computer Experience:
par
merlin Reputation Level


Why are you trying to find an update to a Windows version ?
I have enough problems with this one.


Last edited by merlin; 13th November 2003 at 13:33.
merlin is offline  
Old 13th November 2003   #10
Geek Member
 
Profile:
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Peterborough, UK
Posts: 807
Computer Experience:
SC/MP
Hugh Jarss Reputation Level


nice one, merlin! - HJ
Hugh Jarss is offline  
Old 13th November 2003   #11
Inactive
Lifetime Subscription
 
Profile:
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Marlboro, NY.
Posts: 6,211
Computer Experience:
Gaining more every d
BillyBob Reputation LevelBillyBob Reputation LevelBillyBob Reputation LevelBillyBob Reputation LevelBillyBob Reputation LevelBillyBob Reputation Level


I find that it may make a different on how you get to Windows Updates.

I used the link it the Start Menu and got one thing.

I open IE and then used the link from Tools and got something different.

I find it best to use the same one everytime.

And I do have to agree with Hugh Jarss about leaving Windows on the C: drive. Unless you are willing to do some REAL HEAVY DUTY regediting to make sure all references to things get changed.

Windows updates and other thing look for the DEFAULT Windows settings. And anything else may raise pure hello with things.

And with IE open the update site is more apt to get the correct version OF IE.

TMP=C:\WINDOWS\TEMP
TEMP=C:\WINDOWS\TEMP
winbootdir=C:\WINDOWS
PATH=C:\WINDOWS;C:\WINDOWS\COMMAND
COMSPEC=C:\WINDOWS\COMMAND.COM
windir=C:\WINDOWS


I like those. They help very much in keeping Windows under control.

BillyBob

BillyBob is offline  
Old 13th November 2003   #12
Inactive
 
Profile:
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Albuquerque, NM, USA
Posts: 5,747
Computer Experience:
still learning
Welshjim Reputation Level


Thanks for the responses!!
Still having the problem today.
It is quite likely that the problem is with Win98FE, though Neil does not say what version of Win98 he uses.
Those of you without the problem seem to be using Win98SE.

BillyBob--I tried accessing WinUp three different ways, but all give the same result. (Of course all, on the surface, say they are using the same link.)


Last edited by Welshjim; 13th November 2003 at 23:02.
Welshjim is offline  
Old 14th November 2003   #13
Senior Member
 
Profile:
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 73
Computer Experience:
beginner
neil Reputation Level


I tried same two methods as billybob, and got same result. "no update available". I'm still using good ol original Win 98.
Neil

neil is offline  
Old 14th November 2003   #14
Inactive
Lifetime Subscription
 
Profile:
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Marlboro, NY.
Posts: 6,211
Computer Experience:
Gaining more every d
BillyBob Reputation LevelBillyBob Reputation LevelBillyBob Reputation LevelBillyBob Reputation LevelBillyBob Reputation LevelBillyBob Reputation Level


Quote:
It is quite likely that the problem is with Win98FE,
That could very well be the case.

Quote:
I'm still using good ol original Win 98.
neil

I suggest that you do something about that AND SOON. If you could find a copy of 98SE it will go ver 98 very nicely. That would get you by for a while.

Either that or get another HD and put XP Pro on it. And keep your 98FE as is for awhile. ( do not plug both in at the same time ) keep FE as a backup only. I still have my 98SE as such.

BillyBob

BillyBob is offline  
Old 14th November 2003   #15
Senior Member
 
Profile:
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Rio Rancho, NM 87124
Posts: 139
Computer Experience:
intermediate
princessmandi8 Reputation Level


using win98Se. On Monday, clicked Start/Setting/Windows Update and given one critical update that I downloaded and installed.
Today (Thurs. eve), repeated the steps and No Updates Available.
I always get 3 Updates for Windows (not critical), which I ignore.
My assumption and hope is the MS will continue support until January '04.

princessmandi8 is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 22:52.






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright © 2002 - 2008 WindowsBBS.com. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use, Legal Information & Privacy Policy
[]