1. You are viewing our forum as a guest. For full access please Register. WindowsBBS.com is completely free, paid for by advertisers and donations.

Does partitioning a hard drive increase performance?

Discussion in 'PC Hardware' started by psaulm119, 2014/11/27.

  1. 2014/11/27
    psaulm119 Lifetime Subscription

    psaulm119 Geek Member Thread Starter

    Joined:
    2003/12/07
    Messages:
    1,424
    Likes Received:
    21
    I just ordered a 2 Tb WD internal hard drive, and will be migrating/cloning a Win7 drive with about 600 gigs of data on it. This new WD will be the only hdd on the computer (HP Pavillion P6650z, 4 gigs RAM, Athlon II X2 3Ghz cpu).

    I know there are other reasons for partitioning, but the only reason I'm interested in partitioning this WD is for the sake of increasing performance. Would making, say a C partition with 200 gigs for the OS and programs, and a D partition for the rest (1.8 Tb) for files, improve the performance at all?
     
  2. 2014/11/27
    Christer

    Christer Geek Member Staff

    Joined:
    2002/12/17
    Messages:
    6,566
    Likes Received:
    73
    If you limit the size of the partition for the operating system, it will get faster. The reason is that the outer tracks on the HDD transfer data faster than the inner tracks. This is however old technology and most performance oriented PC-builders today use a SSD-drive for the operating system and the 2TB WD for the data. Personally, I would also get a second WD for backups ... :cool: ... or Hitachi or whichever!
     

  3. to hide this advert.

  4. 2014/11/27
    MrBill

    MrBill SuperGeek WindowsBBS Team Member

    Joined:
    2006/01/14
    Messages:
    4,301
    Likes Received:
    267
    While this may be all and great, do you really have 2TB of stuff you need? Either way, when the drive goes SOUTH, you will have nothing. Couple 500 or couple of 1TB is the way I would go. One for everything and one for backups if you have that much.
     
  5. 2014/11/28
    Bill

    Bill SuperGeek WindowsBBS Team Member

    Joined:
    2002/01/11
    Messages:
    3,332
    Likes Received:
    389
    No. Not really. It is true the outer tracks contain more data (larger circumference = more data per rotation) but that outer track is there, whether partitioned or not. And files get moved all the time, either by the user, Windows Update and other updaters replacing them, defragging, etc. And regardless, we are talking about a couple milliseconds, if that.

    And if you put your OS on the C partition and your applications or data files on the D partition, the drive still only has one set of R/W heads that can only do one thing at a time. So the OS can only access one partition at a time anyway, then has to wait for the R/W head to position itself over the other partition to read the data there. No performance advantage at all!

    Partitioning really is just for user convenience - if set up properly. But sadly, they frequently are not setup properly and we see this all the time as users complain of running out of space on the C partition when they still have 100s of gigabytes of free space on the drive, just in the wrong partition.

    With two separate hard drives, however, the OS knows how to access both drives at once so it can, and will write to one drive and read from the other drive at the same time with no problems, or read from both or write to both simultaneously.

    There are many experts who advise you do NOT partition SSDs and I agree with that. If you don't partition, the SSD maintenance routines (TRIM, wear leveling, etc.) can use the entire drive to ensure maximum life of the whole drive. Not so if you partition it.
     
    Bill,
    #4
  6. 2014/12/07
    Barry

    Barry Geek Member

    Joined:
    2002/12/16
    Messages:
    1,209
    Likes Received:
    10
    Not a performance enhancement, but partitioning a HDD can lessen the chance of losing your stored files, if separate from an OS that becomes corrupted. Having the OS on a SSD and storing your files on a HDD is a better idea.
     
  7. 2014/12/07
    Bill

    Bill SuperGeek WindowsBBS Team Member

    Joined:
    2002/01/11
    Messages:
    3,332
    Likes Received:
    389
    Or better yet (in terms of drive reliability) OS on one SSD and files on another SSD. With no moving parts, a SSD is much more likely to last years longer than a HD. A current generation SSD, that is.
     
    Bill,
    #6

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.