1. You are viewing our forum as a guest. For full access please Register. WindowsBBS.com is completely free, paid for by advertisers and donations.

Vista defragmenter versus Defraggler?

Discussion in 'Other PC Software' started by yorkshire lass, 2008/06/18.

  1. 2008/06/18
    yorkshire lass

    yorkshire lass Inactive Thread Starter

    Joined:
    2008/04/20
    Messages:
    25
    Likes Received:
    0
    I used to use Defraggler to defragment and out of curiosity I analysed my C drive to see if there was any difference. Vista said that my file system was ok and there was no need to defragment. Defraggler said that there were 189 fragmented files and 658 total fragments. Which one should I believe???
     
    yorkshire lass,
    #1
  2. 2008/06/18
    Steve R Jones

    Steve R Jones SuperGeek Staff

    Joined:
    2001/12/30
    Messages:
    12,285
    Likes Received:
    249
    Both of the above:D

    Apparently, to Vista - 189 fragmented files and 658 total fragments is A-OK.
     
    Steve R Jones,
    #2


  3. to hide this advert.

  4. 2008/06/18
    yorkshire lass

    yorkshire lass Inactive Thread Starter

    Joined:
    2008/04/20
    Messages:
    25
    Likes Received:
    0
    Thank you for the information. I'll stick with the Vista defrag from now on. If it ain't broke don't fix it!!
     
    yorkshire lass,
    #3

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Accept Learn More...