|
Nothing wrong with free and I completely agree with that. I do, however, find it "odd" that we are willing to spend several hundred dollars for a computer and then balk at $30 for paid security. Very strange indeed. Again, I'm not meaning to be confrontational by this observation. It's just so strange to me. Now, I'm not suggesting that the OP keep McAfee or purchase Norton or any other host of other paid security programs. If he is happy with the freebies, then by all means. I do a lot of banking and purchasing online and given the nature of what I do plus the investment I have in my hardware, I opt for paid protection. I suppose we're all different in this regards and perhaps have different sets of values.
The "other" observation I would make is in regard to someone saying that his particular program does a "better" job than McAfee or Norton. How does one do a better job than perfect? I've had McAfee for years and I've never had an issue... period. I've gone online and double-checked with online scanners. At one time I also downloaded and used (on demand) other free anti-virus, anti-malware programs and again... they found nothing. So for someone to suggest that his program "does a better job than McAfee" is strange to me. I wouldn't know what better than perfect is having had essentially perfect protection for these many years. Just another observation. It seems to me that we become "attached" to our own programs and by recommending them and in turn putting down others, it someone justifies our own decision-making.
Last edited by James; 2nd January 2009 at 03:04.
|